Ritual Deliberation

Tanasoca, Ana; Sass, Jensen

doi:10.1111/jopp.12182

Cited by 20 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 86 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Se considera que estas instancias tienen un carácter cívico y solemne (Coleman & Moss, 2016) de deliberación mediada (Echeverría, 2019), que proveen legitimidad al sistema democrático (Coleman, 2000;Olson, 2013), y que aumentan la confianza pública en la política electoral (Lucaites, 1989). Incluso quienes sostienen una mirada crítica de este rol normativo reconocen una cualidad de deliberación ritual en el evento (Tanasoca & Sass, 2019).…”

Section: Características De Los Debates Electorales Y Sus Agendasunclassified

Comparación entre la cobertura de la prensa a campañas presidenciales y la agenda de los periodistas que conducen debates

Ortega-Gunckel

Núñez-Mussa

Porath

2022

Comysoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Campaign coverage would prefer strategic game and personalization topics more than public policy proposals. Instead, electoral debates on television are expected differentiate from the journalistic routine. Through a content analysis, the journalists’ agenda in four Chilean presidential debates is compared with that of the written press in the coverage of the respective campaigns. The results show that journalists in the debates focus on public policies, while the press concentrates on strategies or political issues.

show abstract

Section: Características De Los Debates Electorales Y Sus Agendasunclassified

Comparación entre la cobertura de la prensa a campañas presidenciales y la agenda de los periodistas que conducen debates

Ortega-Gunckel

Núñez-Mussa

Porath

2022

Comysoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But if the elements of deliberative quality do not co-occur, we are left with a problem of interpreting what the different elements of deliberative quality actually mean. For instance, when actors justify their positions at length in a plenary debate but are simultaneously disrespectful, are we seeing a (moderate) contribution to deliberative quality (since they provided reasons), or are we observing ritualistic behaviour (Tanasoca and Sass 2019) or even (sophisticated) strategic behaviour? It is possible that a combination of ritualistic and strategic behaviour is at play here: since the norms of public debating in Western democracies generally value reasoned argument but not respect for the arguments of political opponents, strategic actors will use such mixed strategies (justification and disrespect).…”

Section: Aggregationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy is the first book that brings together a wide range of methods used in the study of deliberative democracy. It offers thirty-one different methods that scholars use for theorizing, measuring, exploring, or applying deliberative democracy. Each chapter presents one method by explaining its utility in deliberative democracy research and providing guidance on its application by drawing on examples from previous studies. The book hopes to inspire scholars to undertake methodologically robust, intellectually creative, and politically relevant research. It fills a significant gap in a rapidly growing field of research by assembling diverse methods and thereby expanding the range of methodological choices available to students, scholars, and practitioners of deliberative democracy.

show abstract

“…The villages in this study initially distrusted the higher-level governments' capabilities because of unchanged recipient data regarding the Rastra program (despite changes being proposed by the villages), leading to village pessimism that conducting musdes would solve the mistargeting issues. Rather than authentic deliberation (Tanasoca & Sass, 2019), musdes Rastra then became simply ritual deliberation, in which the villages used the deliberation process to legitimize predetermined decisions.…”

Section: How and Why Do Musdes And Deliberation Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revisiting the State’s Targeting Design and Distribution of Social Protection Programs

Kartowinomo¹

2021

salus cultura

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Government of Indonesia has implemented social protection programs (SPPs) to reduce the impact of the economic crisis and continued to implement the programs in the recent pandemic situation. To increase the effectiveness of the program implementation, the state involves local governments and communities both in the targeting process and program delivery. The central government involves a village meeting called musyawarah desa (musdes) to update beneficiary’ data of social protection programs and Basis Data Terpadu (BDT-Unified Database). However, issues of mistargeting in the form of inclusion and exclusion error persist. Using the deliberative democracy framework and ethnographic case study approach, this study seeks to understand why mistargeting continues to occur by assessing the process of the musdes. This study found the problems of a centralized design of targeting in the existing social, power and accountability relations in the village, and suggest the need to consider giving more authority and responsibility to local governments and villages in the targeting process and delivery of the SPPs.

show abstract

Ritual Deliberation

Cited by 20 publications

References 86 publications

Comparación entre la cobertura de la prensa a campañas presidenciales y la agenda de los periodistas que conducen debates

Comparación entre la cobertura de la prensa a campañas presidenciales y la agenda de los periodistas que conducen debates

Research Methods in Deliberative Democracy

Revisiting the State’s Targeting Design and Distribution of Social Protection Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About