Risky encounters with doctors? Medical diversity and health-related strategies of the inhabitants of Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

Abstract

This paper introduces the notion of 'risky encounters', referring to the way in which contacts with doctors are commonly perceived by the inhabitants of Bishkek, the capital city of Kyrgyzstan. The author's research conducted between 2011 and 2013 revealed that most people were extremely critical of biomedical personnel, despite positive assessments of healthcare reforms expressed by experts. Owing to the prevailing distrust of doctors, their interventions are often considered risky to one's health, which strongly influences people's health-related strategies in the context of medical diversity. This perception of risk is deeply embedded in feelings of uncertainty and anxiety, which should be viewed from the more general perspective of the political, economic and social uncertainties resulting from the difficulties of the period of post-Soviet transformation. It is evident that medical diversity in Bishkek provides people in need with many non-biomedical treatment options, and a distrust of doctors significantly contributes to the popularity of complementary medicine. Economic constraints and local concepts of health, illness and efficacy are among the many other factors that play a role in therapeutic choices. However, the current paper focuses on risk, uncertainty and trust, as emotions that are central to an understanding of the health-related strategies and tactics used by the inhabitants of present-day Bishkek.

From Witch-Doctoring to Holistic Well-Being: Journalistic Representations of Three Influential Estonian CAM Doctors

“…Spiritual and folk healing practices were commonly prosecuted across the USSR as they opposed the statesupported narrative of scientific materialism (Kõiva 2014). Although non-biomedical therapies were marginalised, medical diversity as such did not disappear from the Soviet Union (Lindquist 2006;Honey 2012;Penkala-Gawęcka 2016. Throughout the Soviet era, folk medicine and self-medication remained part of everyday life in Estonia (Goršič 2018a(Goršič , 2018b.…”

A Place for Women Only: Health, Healing and the Divine at an Islamic Shrine in Central Asia

“…Today, as Danuta Penkala-Gawecka adeptly points out in her study of medical choices in Bishkek, people in Central Asia recognise the efficacy of biomedical practices, yet they often distrust physicians. 15 This distrust stems from the fact that many competent physicians have left the Central Asian Republics to work elsewhere such as in Russia. The physicians who remain often have not received the same calibre of training (partly due to the exodus of well-trained physicians) or they lack necessary resources and updated equipment.…”

“Satanism is witchcraft’s younger sibling”: Changing perceptions of natural and supernatural anaemia causality in Malawian children

“…It has however been recognised that biomedicine and what is often termed 'traditional' medicine do not constitute binary opposites, but are both part of a continuum, and that each of them are perceived to be useful for different kinds of disorders [8]. Herbs used in traditional medicine are incorporated in biomedicine, and non-medical therapies such as acupuncture have been practised by some medical doctors [9]. At the same time, Western medical science do put a fundamental opposition between the 'real and unreal' [10], and in most countries there are hierarchies of legitimacy in the way different practitioners are perceived [11,12].…”

“…Still, the use of informal or 'traditional' health practitioners that 'operate on the margins of legitimacy' is widespread and should thus not be neglected [12]. Medical pluralism [9] or medical parallelism [13] is evident in many African communities, and may expand the possible avenues of treatment, but also complicate the decision-making processes for patients and their families. Colvin et al conclude that "treatment decision making is a dynamic process characterised by uncertainty and debate, experimentation with multiple and simultaneous treatments, and shifting interpretations of the course of the illness and best treatment options" [4].…”