2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risky decision-making after exposure to a food-choice task in excess weight adolescents: Relationships with reward-related impulsivity and hunger

Abstract: ObjectiveTo assess the effects of exposure to a food-choice task (appetizing versus healthy food) on risky decision-making by excess versus normal weight adolescents. We also analyzed the influence of food visualization on hunger levels, as well as group differences in food choices and impulsivity.MethodsFifty-six adolescents (aged 13–18 years) classified as excess (n = 27) or normal (n = 29) weight participated in the study. Risky-decision-making was assessed through the Balloon Analogue Risk Task, which was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(54 reference statements)
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, 57.1% of participants considered making frequently unhealthy decisions about their food. Similar findings by other researchers show that patients with obesity made more impulsive unhealthy food decisions in the presence of food and hunger [ 43 , 44 ]. Regarding mood and food behavior, 72.6% of participants affirmed that mood influences their food intake, and 71.7% of participants stated that mood prompted them to eat more.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, 57.1% of participants considered making frequently unhealthy decisions about their food. Similar findings by other researchers show that patients with obesity made more impulsive unhealthy food decisions in the presence of food and hunger [ 43 , 44 ]. Regarding mood and food behavior, 72.6% of participants affirmed that mood influences their food intake, and 71.7% of participants stated that mood prompted them to eat more.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The findings of the second experiment also suggest a hunger bias: the eco-themed labels no longer had an impact when people were (very) hungry during decision-making. This finding may be explained by the fact that hunger induces lower inhibitory control and more impulsive behaviors [67,68]. People who are hungry seem to favor short-term pleasures over long-term (especially altruistic) benefits such as sustainability [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%