2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2007.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks of unsatisfactory airborne bacteria level in air-conditioned offices of subtropical climates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar studies were conducted in four office buildings in Warsaw, Poland, and the results showed that the concentration of bacteria in the office rooms air was 500 CFU m −3 (Gołofit-Szymczak and Górny 2010). Results obtained in office buildings in Gliwice are analogous to the data found in studies carried out in air-conditioned office buildings in Hong Kong, where the mean concentration of airborne bacteria w a s 5 8 0 C F U m − 3 , w i t h a m a x i m u m v a l u e o f 2300 CFU m −3 (Mui et al 2008). A significantly lower concentration level of bacterial aerosol was found in Turin, Italy, during the summer, where the average concentration of bacterial aerosol was 198 CFU m −3 and the maximum concentration was 368 CFU m −3 (Bonetta et al 2010).…”
Section: Viable-culturable Count (Vcc) Of Bacterial Aerosolsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Similar studies were conducted in four office buildings in Warsaw, Poland, and the results showed that the concentration of bacteria in the office rooms air was 500 CFU m −3 (Gołofit-Szymczak and Górny 2010). Results obtained in office buildings in Gliwice are analogous to the data found in studies carried out in air-conditioned office buildings in Hong Kong, where the mean concentration of airborne bacteria w a s 5 8 0 C F U m − 3 , w i t h a m a x i m u m v a l u e o f 2300 CFU m −3 (Mui et al 2008). A significantly lower concentration level of bacterial aerosol was found in Turin, Italy, during the summer, where the average concentration of bacterial aerosol was 198 CFU m −3 and the maximum concentration was 368 CFU m −3 (Bonetta et al 2010).…”
Section: Viable-culturable Count (Vcc) Of Bacterial Aerosolsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Staphylococcus and Micrococcus were dominant among the 11 genera identified in that study. Additionally, Grampositive cocci, including Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, have been reported to be dominant in the indoor air in schools (Aydogdu et al 2005;Bartlett et al 2004), homes (Pastuszka et al 2000), hospitals (Sarica et al 2002), offices (Mui et al 2008), and public buildings (Kim and Kim 2007). The bacterial genera isolated predominantly in our study are from both environmental and human sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Staphylococcus (50%), Micrococcus (15-20%), Corynebacterium (5-25%), and Bacillus (5-15%) were detected as the popular bacterial genera in Korea hospital (Kim et al, 2010). Moreover, Staphylococcus and Micrococcus were also considered as the prevalent bacteria in the air in other indoor environments such as in schools (Aydogdu et al, 2005), family homes (Pastuszka et al, 2000), university hospitals (Sarica et al, 2002), air-conditioned offices (Mui et al, 2008), public buildings (Kim and Kim, 2007), libraries and archives (Karbowska-Berent et al, 2011). All of these dominant airborne bacteria are originated from nature environment and center as human beings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%