1981
DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1981.0082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks in the built environment

Abstract: There are good statistics for deaths in transport accidents, fires, and from accidents in the home in Great Britain, and considerable (but less comprehensive) information about injuries and material damage. Information about the causes of these events is much more scanty, and little is known about the long-term effects of accidental injury. The available data are reviewed and the nature, magnitude and frequency of various kinds of risks are analysed for different age groups and in relation to environmental and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of the blame for this can be laid at the feet of those in power who have imposed stringent regulations where more modest proposals would have sufficed and the media who have provided frightening publicity and generated a large degree of chemophobia. There are risks in the built environment of course [93] but they are more to do with motor transport or fire than asbestos or benzene. If we persist in a policy of scaremongering dressed up as public health measures then we must accept that, to quote an American author [94] '... the cost of cleaning up phantom hazards will be in the hundreds of billions of dollars with minimal benefit to human health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the blame for this can be laid at the feet of those in power who have imposed stringent regulations where more modest proposals would have sufficed and the media who have provided frightening publicity and generated a large degree of chemophobia. There are risks in the built environment of course [93] but they are more to do with motor transport or fire than asbestos or benzene. If we persist in a policy of scaremongering dressed up as public health measures then we must accept that, to quote an American author [94] '... the cost of cleaning up phantom hazards will be in the hundreds of billions of dollars with minimal benefit to human health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%