2003
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhg044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and Portfolio Decisions Involving Hedge Funds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

35
765
4
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,067 publications
(817 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
35
765
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Hedge funds can follow much more dynamic trading strategies and can take short as well as The results using the 6-factor model of Agarwal and Naik (2004) are similar.…”
Section: Performance At Hedge Fundsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Hedge funds can follow much more dynamic trading strategies and can take short as well as The results using the 6-factor model of Agarwal and Naik (2004) are similar.…”
Section: Performance At Hedge Fundsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Arguably, hedge funds may change their weights on the buy-and-hold and buy-and-hedge strategies in response to changes in investment opportunities and market conditions, an issue we explore in detail, later in the paper. 15 To further highlight the economic importance of the X factors, we also compare the adjusted-R 2 from our model with adjusted-R 2' s from other models used in the hedge fund literature including the Carhart (1997) model augmented with out-of-the-money call and put options on S&P 500 index as in Agarwal and Naik (2004) and the Fung and Hsieh (2004) seven-factor model. The results in Appendix A show that the explanatory power from these models ranges from 7% to 30%, which is substantially lower than the range of 24% to 53% obtained with our more parsimonious model.…”
Section: A Model Of Ca Hedge Fund Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Panel A reports the results from the Carhart (1997) 4-factor model augmented with the out-of-the-money call (OTM CALL) and put (OTM PUT) option factors as in Agarwal and Naik (2004). The 4factor model of Carhart (1997) includes MKTRF, SMB, HML, and MOM that refer to excess returns on the market (valueweighted return on all NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ stocks minus the one-month Treasury bill rate), Fama-French (1993) size and bookto-market factors, and momentum factor.…”
Section: Table 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These discriminant functions provide a set of scores for each of the 17 styles. 3 Subsequently, the discriminant functions are used to determine the scores for the subsample of funds for which the appropriate style classi…cation is missing, after which each fund is allocated to its "most likely" style. While such a procedure necessarily is subject to classi…cation error, its within sample performance is rather well, with 52.3 % of the funds classi…ed correctly in one of 17 investment styles.…”
Section: ) On Average Each Fund Is Character-mentioning
confidence: 99%