2013
DOI: 10.1504/ijnvo.2013.063049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risks and benefits of knowledge sharing in co-opetitive knowledge networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co‐creation benefits include: enhanced engagement of employees (Hatch and Schultz, ); better supply chain integration (Jüttner, Christopher and Godsell, ); improved shareholder commitment (Madden, Fehle and Fournier, ); and knowledge sharing with competitors (Kohlbacher, ), which occurs especially in ‘co‐opetitive’ contexts, providing major benefits, but also creating risks (Ilvonen and Vuori, ). Scholars agree that co‐creation research is important, especially in investigating how co‐creation offers new opportunities for enterprises (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co‐creation benefits include: enhanced engagement of employees (Hatch and Schultz, ); better supply chain integration (Jüttner, Christopher and Godsell, ); improved shareholder commitment (Madden, Fehle and Fournier, ); and knowledge sharing with competitors (Kohlbacher, ), which occurs especially in ‘co‐opetitive’ contexts, providing major benefits, but also creating risks (Ilvonen and Vuori, ). Scholars agree that co‐creation research is important, especially in investigating how co‐creation offers new opportunities for enterprises (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While efficiency is achieved by using a prescribed protocol to identify, select, and assess articles without being biased and subjective, effectiveness results by synthesizing the literature, communicating the depth of knowledge on key major themes and concepts, and building important relationships among them (e.g., Watson, 2015). Previous reviews on coopetition either lack an established system that supports efficient detection and searching of articles (e.g., Bengtsson, Eriksson, & Wincent, 2010;Walley, 2007), or limit their scope to address only specific dimensions of coopetition (Ilvonen & Vuori, 2013;Rai, 2013;Petter, Resende, Andrade Júnior, & Horst, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, information security deals with a variety of solutions that prepare against and/or respond to threats to information such as information leaks to competitors and knowledge loss through staff turnover [20]. Such threats inform the design of formal and informal protection measures that share as a common starting point the clear identification of critical information assets [21]. The appropriate recognition of which information sustains business value creation is a specific managerial capability and requires an articulation of the role of information in the business, combined with the specification of practices that deal with how that information should be secured [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%