Risk, Uncertainty and Monetary Policy

Abstract

In 2013 all ECB publications feature a motif taken from the €5 banknote.note: This Working Paper should not be reported as representing the views of the European Central Bank (ECB). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the ECB. ABSTRACTThe VIX, the stock market option-based implied volatility, strongly co-moves with measures of the monetary policy stance. When decomposing the VIX into two components, a proxy for risk aversion and expected stock market volatility ("uncertainty"), we find that a lax monetary policy decreases both risk aversion and uncertainty, with the former effect being stronger. The result holds in a structural vector autoregressive framework, controlling for business cycle movements and using a variety of identification schemes for the vector autoregression in general and monetary policy shocks in particular. The effect of monetary policy on risk aversion is also apparent in regressions using high frequency data. JEL Codes:E44, E52, G12, G20, E32 Keywords:Monetary policy, option implied volatility, risk aversion, uncertainty, business cycle 2 NON-TECHNICAL SUMMARYA popular indicator of risk aversion in financial markets, the VIX index, strongly co-moves with measures of the monetary policy stance in the United States. While the current VIX is positively associated with future (real) Fed funds rates, the relationship turns negative and significant after 13 months: high VIX readings are correlated with expansionary monetary policy in the mediumrun future (see Figure 1).The strong interaction between the VIX index, known as a "fear index" (Whaley (2000) (2005) ascribe the bulk of the effect to easier monetary policy lowering risk premiums, reflecting both a reduction in economic and financial volatility and an increase in the capacity of financial investors to bear risk. By using the VIX and its two components, we test the effect of monetary policy on stock market risk, but also provide more precise information on the exact channel.This article characterizes the dynamic links between risk aversion, uncertainty and monetary policy in a structural vector autoregressive (VAR) framework. Our VARs always include a business cycle indicator to control for business cycle movements. The main findings are as 3 follows. A lax monetary policy decreases risk aversion in the stock market after about nine months. This effect is persistent, lasting for more than two years. Moreover, monetary policy shocks account for a significant proportion of the variance of the risk aversion proxy. Monetary policy shocks have a significant impact on risk aversion also in regressions using high frequency data. The effects of monetary policy on uncertainty are similar but somewhat weaker.On the other hand, periods of both high uncertainty and high risk aversion are followed by a looser monetary policy stance but these results are less robust and weaker statistically. Finally, it is the uncertainty component of the VIX that has the statistically stronger effect on the business cyc...

The only certainty is uncertainty: An analysis of the impact of COVID-19 uncertainty on regional stock markets

“…To confirm that Δ CV 19 I t reflects uncertainty during the pandemic, we compare our measure against two other measures over the COVID-19 period. The first is the CBOE Volatility index (VIX) which we treat as a measure of stock market uncertainty ( Bekaert et al, 2013 ). Although this is the US version of the index, Smales (2019) shows that VIX captures global market uncertainty.…”

Risk aversion connectedness in developed and emerging equity markets before and after the COVID-19 pandemic

“…It incorporates any event (either positive or negative) that affects underlying spot prices, as any positive shock will raise investors' bullish outlook and will move call options prices higher and put options prices lower and vice versa. In order to derive information about the risk parameters, Bekaert et al. (2013) suggest that the volatility index should be cleansed of the normal volatility dynamics and uncertainty influence by calculating the variance risk premium, which is the difference between the realized return variance of the underlying equity index and the implied volatility index squared.…”

Welfare costs of monetary policy uncertainty in the economy with shifting trend inflation

“…With various identification schemes, the empirical studies have examined the aggregate effects of uncertainty but the results are still ambiguous. For example, a block of studies by Alexopoulos and Cohen (2009), Bloom (2009), and Bloom, Floetotto, Jaimovich, and Terry (2012) shows a sizable effect of uncertainty in productivity on aggregate variables like GDP and employment, whereas Bachmann, Elstner, and Sims (2013), Bachmann and Bayer (2013), and Bekaert, Hoerova, and Duca (2013) report evidence on small impacts. In addition to inconclusive evidence, previous studies have mainly analyzed the adverse impacts of uncertainty on economic activities while abstracting opposite directions.…”