Risk, trust and patients’ strategic choices of healthcare practitioners

Abstract

Research on patients’ choice of healthcare practitioners has focussed on countries with regulated and controlled healthcare markets. In contrast, low‐ and middle‐income countries have a pluralistic landscape where untrained, unqualified and unlicensed informal healthcare providers (IHPs) provide significant share of services. Using qualitative data from 58 interviews in an Indian village, this paper explores how patients choose between IHPs and qualified practitioners in the public and formal private sectors. The study found that patients’ choices were structurally constrained by accessibility and affordability of care and choosing a practitioner from any sector presented some risk. Negotiation and engagement with risks depended on perceived severity of the health condition and trust in practitioners. Patients had low institutional trust in public and formal private sectors, whereas IHPs operated outside any institutional framework. Consequently, people relied on relational or competence‐derived interpersonal trust. Care was sought from formal private practitioners for severe issues due to high‐competence‐based interpersonal trust in them, whereas for other issues IHPs were preferred due to high relationship‐based interpersonal trust. The research shows that patients develop a strategic approach to practitioner choice by using trust to negotiate risks, and crucially, in low‐ and middle‐income countries IHPs bridge a gap by providing accessible and affordable care imbued with relational–interpersonal trust.

Antibiotics in the Community During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study to Understand Users’ Perspectives of Antibiotic Seeking and Consumption Behaviors in Bangladesh

“… 64 Self-negotiation and engagement with risks might have been influenced by the perceived severity of the illness and therefore, their trust in professional advice. 65 This may have been due to the sudden health crisis being caused by a relatively “new disease” with no proven therapeutics by which to tackle it.…”

Interrogating paradigmatic commitments of focus group methodology: An invitation to context-sensitive qualitative research methods.

“…Bholi was a deprived village of about 350 families in northern India along the Nepal border with a predominantly “lower caste” Hindu population. Most families in the village were dependent on subsistence farming or unskilled manual labor in the nearest town—a fuller description of the village is available in Chauhan (2016), and Chauhan and Campbell (2021). AC was born in the same province and as a native speaker, used the local dialect ( bajjika ) during interviews and FGDs.…”

Analysis of the Healthcare and Overall Economic Competitiveness of Santiago, Isabela, Philippines

“…It showed that widespread perceptions of the relative worth of practitioners and services, even when they contradict available evidence, are at the heart of healthcare decision making. The study of Chauhan & Campbell (2021) explored the interpretation of the patients to the risks and how it is allied in seeking the three levels of healthcare, specifically in the middle-and low-income countries. This showed that the choices of the patients are still limited to the access and the affordability of healthcare.…”