2017
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsx124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-taking, peer-influence and child maltreatment: a neurocognitive investigation

Abstract: Maltreatment is associated with increased risk of a range of psychiatric disorders, many of which are characterized by altered risk-taking propensity. Currently, little is known about the neural correlates of risk-taking in children exposed to maltreatment, nor whether their risk-taking is atypically modulated by peer influence. Seventy-five 10- to 14-year-old children [maltreated (MT) group: N = 41; non-maltreated Group (NMT): N = 34] performed a Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), under three different peer i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Adversity-related associations with salience network activation have been inconsistent in children with mixed adversity exposures. One study reported greater anterior insula activation in maltreated children with increasing levels of risk in a risk-taking paradigm (Hoffman et al 2018a). Two others reported lower insula (Puetz et al 2016) and insula and dACC (Puetz et al 2014) activity to rejection words and social exclusion, respectively, among maltreated youth.…”
Section: Mixed Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adversity-related associations with salience network activation have been inconsistent in children with mixed adversity exposures. One study reported greater anterior insula activation in maltreated children with increasing levels of risk in a risk-taking paradigm (Hoffman et al 2018a). Two others reported lower insula (Puetz et al 2016) and insula and dACC (Puetz et al 2014) activity to rejection words and social exclusion, respectively, among maltreated youth.…”
Section: Mixed Exposuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, much of the research effort of neuroimaging studies of social facilitation has focused on pleasurable behaviors in adolescents and adults, such as gaming for money (Nawa et al, 2008;Fareri et al, 2012;Kätsyri et al, 2013;Breiner et al, 2018;Chib et al, 2018), donating to charities (Izuma et al, 2010;Van Hoorn et al, 2016) and risk-taking (Chein et al, 2011;Smith et al, 2015Smith et al, , 2018Hoffmann et al, 2018). In these studies, peer presence's most consistent effect was an increase of activation or connectivity in the brain reward system, especially the ventral striatum.…”
Section: Social Facilitation Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Fifth, children who have experienced ACEs may be more vulnerable to peer pressure and external influences, including associations with peers who use substances. 50 Sixth, ACEs can affect brain development and function, including brain's reward system, making children more prone to seeking out substances to experience pleasure or relief. 51 Finally, substance use can perpetuate a cycle of adverse experiences, as it can lead to criminal behaviors, legal problems, and further adverse events, creating a negative feedback loop.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%