2020
DOI: 10.1016/s2666-1683(20)33802-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk tables for predicting progression using the 1973 and 2004/2016 WHO grading classification systems in primary Ta/T1 non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A multicenter EAU NMIBC guidelines panel study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been several publications debating this issue. The GUPS endorses the system that is promulgated since 1998 and advocated in the WHO 2016 version [21][22][23]. One of the many reasons to develop a twotiered system in 1998 was that in a three-tiered, many cases end up in the middle group (group 2), resulting in a rather heterogeneous group.…”
Section: Grading In Nonmuscle-invasive Bladder Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several publications debating this issue. The GUPS endorses the system that is promulgated since 1998 and advocated in the WHO 2016 version [21][22][23]. One of the many reasons to develop a twotiered system in 1998 was that in a three-tiered, many cases end up in the middle group (group 2), resulting in a rather heterogeneous group.…”
Section: Grading In Nonmuscle-invasive Bladder Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%