2023
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.39590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Stratification of Acute-Onset Chest Pain: SVEAT Score Versus HEART and TIMI Scores

Abstract: IntroductionAcute chest pain is a frequently encountered symptom in the emergency department. Despite the availability of various chest pain risk scores, their effectiveness in identifying low-risk patients suitable for safe and early discharge is inadequate. Moreover, clinical data collected at the initial stage, which has valuable discriminatory ability, is often underutilized. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the Symptoms, history of Vascular disease, ECG, Age, and Troponin I (SVEAT) score in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For adults, there are several scoring systems to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute chest pain, such as the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score, the global registry of acute coronary events (GARCE) score, and the HEART score. These scoring systems are widely used in emergency departments, and each of them revealed different sensitivity and specificity to MACE [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. In pediatric patients, a scoring system is not well-established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For adults, there are several scoring systems to predict major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute chest pain, such as the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk score, the global registry of acute coronary events (GARCE) score, and the HEART score. These scoring systems are widely used in emergency departments, and each of them revealed different sensitivity and specificity to MACE [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ]. In pediatric patients, a scoring system is not well-established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%