2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk, shame and the public injector: A qualitative study of drug injecting in South Wales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
106
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
8
106
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…62,63 Recent qualitative research in the United Kingdom shows how particular injecting environments can act as contextual amplifiers of stigma and shame, thus feeding risk rather than its avoidance. 23 Relations between stigma and HIV risks may be circular, with greater levels of stigma driving higher risk behaviors and/or lower access to prevention and treatment services among IDU subgroups, contributing to their further marginalization and vulnerability to other exogenous influences (eg, homelessness, arrest, incarceration). This "vicious circle" has been documented among IDUs of Dai ethnicity in China, a highly stigmatized subgroup that is overrepresented among HIV cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62,63 Recent qualitative research in the United Kingdom shows how particular injecting environments can act as contextual amplifiers of stigma and shame, thus feeding risk rather than its avoidance. 23 Relations between stigma and HIV risks may be circular, with greater levels of stigma driving higher risk behaviors and/or lower access to prevention and treatment services among IDU subgroups, contributing to their further marginalization and vulnerability to other exogenous influences (eg, homelessness, arrest, incarceration). This "vicious circle" has been documented among IDUs of Dai ethnicity in China, a highly stigmatized subgroup that is overrepresented among HIV cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such environments, HIV risk behaviors are shaped by the interplay of structural constraints placed on the availability of HIV prevention materials or the capacity of IDUs to enact risk reduction and what can be termed spatial practices arising from placed-based behavioral routines, norms, and risk perceptions. 23 Homelessness and unstable housing have been associated with a greater risk of HIV infection, [24][25][26][27] perhaps because homeless IDUs have closer engagement with street-based cultures of drug use and transactional sex and are more likely to experience situational disruptions in protective behaviors. 28 In contrast, stable living arrangements have been associated with higher rates of entry into drug abuse treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notwithstanding some recent research on the social identity of marginalised and disadvantaged drug users (Malins, Fitzgerald, & Threadgold, 2006;Rhodes et al, 2007), research on the management of stigma associated with drug use has primarily focused on controlled and recreational, middle-class users who tend to avoid statutory drug treatment services and 'recover naturally' from, or 'mature out' of drug use. In contrast to studies of middle-class controlled users, in our cohort only one of the 53 disengaged drug users interviewed had had a professional career and only four had received post-16 education.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the fear of lacking drugs may serve as social glue, it may also act as a social dissolvent. Parkin (2013, p. 123) describes how drug injectors avoided other members in the drug scene in order to keep from losing drugs and/or money "by either volitional, reciprocal, forced or predatory means", illustrating that drug scenes can be fertile grounds for violence, antagonism, exploitation, mistrust, anxiety, and solitude (see also Agar, 1973;Briggs, 2012;Moore, 2004a;Rhodes et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this respect, togetherness on the street is produced by situational exigencies and a lack of alternative support mechanisms (Friedman et al, 1998a). Rhodes et al (2007) show how drug injection on the street is a result of constraints (e.g. homelessness) and urgent needs (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%