Risk sensitivity as an evolutionary adaptation

Abstract

Risk aversion is a common behavior universal to humans and animals alike. Economists have traditionally defined risk preferences by the curvature of the utility function. Psychologists and behavioral economists also make use of concepts such as loss aversion and probability weighting to model risk aversion. Neurophysiological evidence suggests that loss aversion has its origins in relatively ancient neural circuitries (e.g., ventral striatum). Could there thus be an evolutionary origin to risk aversion? We study this question by evolving strategies that adapt to play the equivalent mean payoff gamble. We hypothesize that risk aversion in this gamble is beneficial as an adaptation to living in small groups, and find that a preference for risk averse strategies only evolves in small populations of less than 1,000 individuals, or in populations segmented into groups of 150 individuals or fewer – numbers thought to be comparable to what humans encountered in the past. We observe that risk aversion only evolves when the gamble is a rare event that has a large impact on the individual's fitness. As such, we suggest that rare, high-risk, high-payoff events such as mating and mate competition could have driven the evolution of risk averse behavior in humans living in small groups.

Equity trade‐offs in conservation decision making

“…Different methods to elicit individual and group stakeholder values and targets can profoundly influence conservation outcomes (Martin et al 2012;Burgman et al 2014;Burton-Chellew et al 2015) due to bounded rationality (Burton-Chellew et al 2015), varying levels of risk aversion (Greiner et al 2009;Hintze et al 2015), framing effects (Krupenye et al 2015), group partiality (Hildreth et al 2016), and other cognitive limitations or biases (Iftekhar & Pannell 2015;Levine et al 2015). Underlying values, which reflect the moral basis of ethical frameworks, are distinct from attitudes, which are explicit realizations of preferences in particular contextualized dilemmas (Ives & Kendal 2014).…”

A marker of biological ageing predicts adult risk preference in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris

“…Decision-making under risk is an important topic in disciplines as diverse as psychology, economics, anthropology, and biology (Hintze et al 2015; Lim et al 2015). Like humans, wild animals face the fact that most actions do not have a single predictable outcome but a range of possible consequences.…”

Country roads, take me home… to my friends: How intelligence, population density, and friendship affect modern happiness

“…Indeed, the mean band or village size of nine modern huntergatherer societies is 148.4 (Dunbar, 1993). Computer simulations of the evolution of risk aversion suggest that it can only evolve in small groups of about 150 individuals (Hintze, Olson, Adami, & Hertwig, 2013). The mean size of personal networks suggested by the number of annual Christmas cards sent is 153.5 (Hill & Dunbar, 2003).…”