2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3421538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Reduction and Efficiency Increase in Large Portfolios: Leverage and Shrinkage

Abstract: We investigate the effects of constraining leverage and shrinking covariance matrix in constructing large portfolios, both theoretically and empirically. Considering a wide variety of setups that involve conditioning or not conditioning the covariance matrix estimator on the recent past (multivariate GARCH), smaller vs. larger universe of stocks, alternative portfolio formation objectives (Global Minimum Variance vs. exposure to profitable factors), and various transaction cost assumptions, we find that a judi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, we work with the set of fully-invested portfolios, i.e., portfolios whose weights sum up to 1, which is the default choice for the bulk of the asset management industry. However, we let the weights be negative and we use the norm-constraint in Zhao et al (2020) to set a lower bound on the weights' values. Then, we introduce a transformation to represent the set of all possible fully-invested portfolios by a convex polytope; i.e., each point in the interior of the polytope corresponds to a single asset allocation.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, we work with the set of fully-invested portfolios, i.e., portfolios whose weights sum up to 1, which is the default choice for the bulk of the asset management industry. However, we let the weights be negative and we use the norm-constraint in Zhao et al (2020) to set a lower bound on the weights' values. Then, we introduce a transformation to represent the set of all possible fully-invested portfolios by a convex polytope; i.e., each point in the interior of the polytope corresponds to a single asset allocation.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we compute the minimum and the maximum value of portfolio volatility. The first one is also called Global Minimum Variance portfolio (Zhao et al 2020). In particular, we solve the following optimization problems, (…”
Section: Set the Levels Of Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this parameter can only be calculated afterward in the Standard model, it is directly linked to the most influential tuning parameter in the LASSO model: the λ Lagrange parameter. δ also provides information on the short-sale budget as well as practitioners' investment rules, as shown by Zhao et al (2019). Naturally, as represented by the black line of Standard models' δ, this parameter is stable over a few months but can have high fluctuations over years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, we do not set the value of δ so that it meets specific well-known constraints such as the shortsale constraint (see DeMiguel et al (2009a)). In contrast to other authors such as Zhao et al (2019), we do not want to achieve any practitioner's rule for investment and therefore do not keep δ as a constant, independent of the present market situation. By contrast, we allow the δ value to change in every period, as we always want to achieve the optimization goal, that is, finding the portfolio with the lowest variance.…”
Section: Empirical Studymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…total short position of at most 50% and thus a gross leverage of at most 2.0; for example, such portfolios are also considered by Zhao et al (2022). Table 5 presents the corresponding results for N = 1, 000.…”
Section: Global Minimum Variance Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 99%