2006
DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcl133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk prediction in patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain: the GRACE and TIMI risk scores versus clinical evaluation

Abstract: In unselected patients presenting with suspected cardiac pain, the GRACE risk score is superior to the TIMI risk score in predicting major cardiac events, and both risk scores are superior to using ECG and troponin findings at presentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several risk scores have been developed, including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI); [4][5][6] Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE); [7][8][9][10] Fast Revascularisation in Instability in Coronary disease (FRISC); 11 and History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART), 12,13 to identify which patients with chest pain of cardiac etiology are at higher risk for worse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. These scores are derived from overlapping clinical variables recorded at time of evaluation, including age, vital signs, comorbidities, and biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several risk scores have been developed, including Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI); [4][5][6] Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE); [7][8][9][10] Fast Revascularisation in Instability in Coronary disease (FRISC); 11 and History, ECG, Age, Risk factors, and Troponin (HEART), 12,13 to identify which patients with chest pain of cardiac etiology are at higher risk for worse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality. These scores are derived from overlapping clinical variables recorded at time of evaluation, including age, vital signs, comorbidities, and biomarkers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past years, several multivariate algorithms have been developed in patients with CP for estimating the need of intensive care [3,[5][6][7]31,32]. However, those studies were performed before troponin testing was routinely available, thus including patients considered at high risk, per se, to date.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, we recognized that these patients were heterogeneous; in fact, they presented with different clinical risk profiles, based on both clinical presentation and the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, and, finally, showed different outcomes. Previous risk models well stratified the overall population of patients with CP at hospital admission; however, they appeared complex to be integrated in clinical practice [3,[5][6][7]32,33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, low-risk patients represented a large and heterogeneous population with a low prevalence of coronary disease, and they presented different cardiovascular risk factors and clinical pattern and finally showed different outcomes. In this subset of patients, some risk scores allowed estimation for the need of intensive care [22,23]. Other models of risk scores well stratified the overall population of patients with CP [24,25]; however, they could not be easily integrated in clinical practice because of their complexity [24,25].…”
Section: Strengths Of Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other models of risk scores well stratified the overall population of patients with CP [24,25]; however, they could not be easily integrated in clinical practice because of their complexity [24,25]. Other risk scores are specific in the prognostic evaluation of patients with a definite acute coronary syndrome [6][7][8][9][10]23]. The simplicity of the novel FPR is caused by the few variables considered and to the relevance given to clinical characteristics of CP at presentation.…”
Section: Strengths Of Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%