Risk perception, community myth, and practices towards COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Ethiopia: Community based crossectional study

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to assess risk perception, community myths, and preventive practice towards COVID-19 among community in Southeast Ethiopia, 2020. Methods Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted among 854 participants selected using a multistage sampling technique. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire adapted from previous literature. Descriptive statistics were done to summarize the variables. A generalized linear model with binary logistic specification was used to identify factors associated with risk perception and practice. Accordingly adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated and those with p-value < 0.05 were considered as significant factors associated with risk perception and practice. Cluster analysis using a linear mixed model was performed to identify factors associated with community myth and those with p-value <0.05 were reported as significant factors associated with community myth. Results All 854 respondents gave their answer yielding 100% response rate. Of these 547 (64.1%) were male, 611 (71.5%) were rural residents, 534 (62.5%) got information about COVID-19 from TV/radio, 591 (69.2%) of them live near health facility, 265 (30.8%) have a history of substance use and 100 (11.7%) have a history of chronic illness, and 415 (48.6%) of them have a high-risk perception, 428 (50.1%) have a wrong myth about COVID-19 and 366 (42.9%) have poor practice respectively. Residence, distances from health facility and myths were significantly associated with risk perception. Occupation, knowledge, and practice were significantly associated with community myths. Also level of education, living near health facilities, having good knowledge and wrong myth were significantly associated with the practice of utilizing COVID-19 preventive respectively. Conclusion The study found high-risk perception, high wrong community myth, and relatively low utilization of available practices towards COVID-19 and factors associated with them.

Assessment of healthcare worker resilience at the epicenter of the 2022 Sudan virus disease outbreak in Uganda: implications for future preparedness

“…Healthcare workers who lived a distance further away from their workplaces were more resilient than those who lived nearer. This is consistent with a previous study in Ethiopia, which showed that high levels of stress and perceived risk of contracting diseases for HCWs during epidemics were linked to living near their workplace health facilities [39]. The ndings of this study are also in line with a study done in Peru which indicated that HCWs' anxiety and mental distress decreased as the distance from the COVID-19 outbreak epicentre increased [40].…”

Risk perception of healthcare workers in the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

“…Conversely, single or separated individuals may experience a greater burden of individual decision-making and caregiving, which could potentially contribute to an increase in their RP. However, it is important to note that the literature on this association is still inconclusive, since two other studies, conducted in Iran [ 56 ] and Ethiopia [ 57 ], did not find this association. This difference may be attributed to the fact that these studies were carried out in distinct countries, each with its unique cultural context.…”