2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk perception and the warning strategy based on safety potential field theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, on single lane road, the longitudinal distance between vehicles is zero. By simplifying (14), the risk field intensity value of the following vehicle can be expressed by (26).…”
Section: ) Secondary Rear-end Collision Accident Risk Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Secondly, on single lane road, the longitudinal distance between vehicles is zero. By simplifying (14), the risk field intensity value of the following vehicle can be expressed by (26).…”
Section: ) Secondary Rear-end Collision Accident Risk Propagation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li thought that the risk field without acceleration parameters could not express the change of vehicle movement trend, and the circular structure could not express the difference of field intensity distribution under the influence of speed. He designed the elliptic structure risk field combined with acceleration parameters, and thus proposed the PFI traffic risk index and established the vehicle collision early warning framework [26], [27], [28]. Now, the application of risk field theory has become a powerful means of vehicle risk assessment [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This characterization of the driving risk degree is completely consistent with the safety risks in the actual driving process of the vehicle. In our previous studies [29,35], the vehicle potential field model was proven to accurately describe the driving risk of vehicles under different motion states in the CAVs environment.…”
Section: Platoon Formation Control Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies, however, focus on the obstacle’s shape but ignore its motion states which markedly influence the collision risk of an obstacle ( 23 ). For example, a moving obstacle with a high velocity may be more dangerous than a non-moving one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%