Objective
To determine the causes of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in apparently healthy children in a single center in the era of primary prevention (screening questionnaire, SQ) and secondary prevention (automated external defibrillator, AED and automated implantable cardioverter defibrillator, AICD).
Study Design
Any child (0–18 year’s age) without prior known disease except for attention deficit disorder who underwent out-of-the hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation was included in the study as SCA. Using retrospective chart review we evaluated the efficacy of the SQ, electrocardiogram (EKG), chest roentgenogram (CXR) and an echocardiogram.
Results
We found 44 out of 6,656 children admitted to intensive care with SCA; an AED was used in 39%, AICD placed in 18% and survival to hospital discharge was 50%. The etiology for SCA was identified in 57% of the cases, mostly in those above one year of age and among these the majority of had a cardiac etiology (50%) while 7% had rupture of an arteriovenous malformation. Stimulant medication use was seen in 11% of the SCA. In the best case scenario of hypothesized primary prevention, a prior SQ, CXR, EKG and echocardiogram may have detected 18%, 9%, 23% and 16% of at-risk cases respectively and 32% may have been detected with EKG and SQ together. Based on a historical control cohort, a positive EKG was significantly higher in children with SCA (p = 0.014).
Conclusion
An EKG along with a screening SQ may be more effective in identifying children who are potentially at-risk for SCA than a SQ alone.