2015
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.1843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Stroke at the Time of Carotid Occlusion

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Many patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis are offered carotid stenting for the prevention of carotid occlusion. However, this treatment may be inappropriate if the risk of stroke is low at the time of occlusion and with intensive medical therapy. OBJECTIVES To determine the risk resulting from progression to occlusion among patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and to assess the role of severity of carotid stenosis or the presence of contralateral occlusion as factors that may predict t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be due to a mistaken perception that a carotid occlusion would be analogous to occlusion of a left main coronary artery—often called a ‘ticking time bomb’. However, since the circle of Willis is so effective in maintaining perfusion beyond a carotid stenosis or occlusion, the risk of stroke at the time of carotid occlusion is actually very low: 0.3%,46 well below the risk of either endarterectomy or stenting. Prevention of occlusion is not a valid reason for carotid intervention in ACS.…”
Section: Risk Of Stenting and Endarterectomy In Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to a mistaken perception that a carotid occlusion would be analogous to occlusion of a left main coronary artery—often called a ‘ticking time bomb’. However, since the circle of Willis is so effective in maintaining perfusion beyond a carotid stenosis or occlusion, the risk of stroke at the time of carotid occlusion is actually very low: 0.3%,46 well below the risk of either endarterectomy or stenting. Prevention of occlusion is not a valid reason for carotid intervention in ACS.…”
Section: Risk Of Stenting and Endarterectomy In Acsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 In another study with follow-up of about 3700 patients in a atherosclerotic clinic during a 20-year period with regular Doppler examinations, <10% were identified as having progression to occlusion. 10 Interestingly, 80% of occlusion occurred before 2002 corresponding to the era of widespread use of statins. 10 In addition, lifestyle modification, such as smoking cessation and reduction of body weight, may also have an impact on the event rate in patients with asymptomatic carotid disease.…”
Section: What Do We Know About the Need For Revascularization In Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Interestingly, 80% of occlusion occurred before 2002 corresponding to the era of widespread use of statins. 10 In addition, lifestyle modification, such as smoking cessation and reduction of body weight, may also have an impact on the event rate in patients with asymptomatic carotid disease.…”
Section: What Do We Know About the Need For Revascularization In Patimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic test obviously preceded the detection of the stenosis, although the subsequent occlusionpreventive intervention is seldom a valid indication in asymptomatic patients. 29 Because of the above cited considerations, payers are often cautious about utilization of certain tests and their consequent expensive treatments. Thus, circumspection on part of the payers, especially for tests based on novel technologies, would not be an unreasonable expectation.…”
Section: Appropriate Usementioning
confidence: 99%