2010
DOI: 10.1002/pds.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of serious ventricular arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in a cohort of users of domperidone: a nested case‐control study

Abstract: The increased risk of SVA/SCD for current domperidone users remained after adjustment for multiple covariates. The risk may vary among subgroups of exposed individuals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
137
3
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
137
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the study by Noord and others, 9 the strengths of the study by Johannes and others 10 included the large study population, the 15-year study period, and an appropriate data collection methodology. In addition, the 3-way comparison of domperidone use with non-use and PPI use may have strengthened the authors' findings by minimizing bias by indication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the study by Noord and others, 9 the strengths of the study by Johannes and others 10 included the large study population, the 15-year study period, and an appropriate data collection methodology. In addition, the 3-way comparison of domperidone use with non-use and PPI use may have strengthened the authors' findings by minimizing bias by indication.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In stratified analyses, the unadjusted OR for current domperidone use relative to non-use was numerically higher for case-control pairs without diabetes, for those older than 60 years, and for men. 10 The authors acknowledged that the 95% CIs for some of the stratified point estimates were wide, which reflected the small number of cases in those subgroups; however, the absolute numbers of cases were not specified. Specifically, the study reported a significantly higher risk of SCD among patients over 60 years of age (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.31-2.05), but the result was nonsignificant among patients 60 years of age or younger (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.35-3.37).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A partir de la lectura de los mismos se incorporaron 7 potenciales trabajos, dando un total de 30 artículos para una reevaluación detallada. Por los motivos indicados en la Figura 1, se excluyeron 27 artículos quedando un total de tres estudios [19][20][21] .…”
Section: Selección De Los Estudiosunclassified
“…El único ítem que recibió la categorización de "riesgo incierto" en dos de los trabajos 19,20 , y con acuerdo de los revisores, fue "cegamiento de la exposición en la selección de los casos". Los requisitos restantes fueron respondidos satisfactoriamente en los tres estudios.…”
Section: Evaluación Del Riesgo De Sesgounclassified