2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11607.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of repeat biopsy and prostate cancer detection after an initial extended negative biopsy: longitudinal follow‐up from a prospective trial

Abstract: What's known on the subject? and What does the study add?• Even after a negative set of prostate biopsies, the risk of undetected prostate cancer remains clinically significant.Predictive markers of such a risk are undefined.• In addition to PSA and PSAD, low prostate volume and %fPSA are interesting time-varying risk factors and are relevant in biopsy decision-making. Objective• To assess prospectively the time-varying risk of rebiopsy and of prostate cancer (PCa) detection after an initial negative biopsy pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
40
2
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
40
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various clinical and pathologic parameters have been considered as predictive of prostate cancer on a rebiopsy, such as PSA, PSA density, percent free PSA, prostate volume, digital rectal examination finding, age, family history of prostate cancer, number of cores taken at biopsy, time between first biopsy and rebiopsy, and presence of high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) at first biopsy (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Several nomograms containing some of these parameters have been developed to aid the rebiopsy decision, but they are hampered by low accuracy (76%-86%; 10, 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various clinical and pathologic parameters have been considered as predictive of prostate cancer on a rebiopsy, such as PSA, PSA density, percent free PSA, prostate volume, digital rectal examination finding, age, family history of prostate cancer, number of cores taken at biopsy, time between first biopsy and rebiopsy, and presence of high-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) or atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) at first biopsy (5)(6)(7)(8)(9). Several nomograms containing some of these parameters have been developed to aid the rebiopsy decision, but they are hampered by low accuracy (76%-86%; 10, 11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mostly slow and heterogeneous growth of PCa lesions probably plays a major role in this issue. The consequence is a substantial number of false negatives in histopathological PCa detection, which is reported between 15 and 30% among first biopsy sampling 47,49,50 . In patients with high PSA levels but repeatedly negative biospies, MRI was proven to increase the detection rate by guided biopsy 27,28,51 .…”
Section: Challenges In Prostate Cancer Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With histopathology currently being the gold standard in PCa diagnosis, a definite diagnosis can only be made by histopathological evaluation 46 . There is a lack of cancer-targeted biopsies, as the standard TRUS has limits to differentiate between malignant and benign prostatic lesions 47,48 . The mostly slow and heterogeneous growth of PCa lesions probably plays a major role in this issue.…”
Section: Challenges In Prostate Cancer Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systemic inflammation is related to various conditions associated with elevated PSA levels. [3] However, PCa is not clearly accompanied by local inflammation histologically. [4] Many kinds of cancer are associated with systemic inflammation, such as chronic inflammation and other factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%