1990
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.72b1.2298779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of refracture after removing hip fixation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study has some limitations: First, in our study no re‐fracture occurred during follow‐up which is different to the literature and could be due to the careful after‐care concept of our patients . After 18 weeks, stability should be equalized …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study has some limitations: First, in our study no re‐fracture occurred during follow‐up which is different to the literature and could be due to the careful after‐care concept of our patients . After 18 weeks, stability should be equalized …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This study has some limitations: First, in our study no re-fracture occurred during follow-up which is different to the literature and could be due to the careful after-care concept of our patients. 24,27,29,[45][46][47][48] After 18 weeks, stability should be equalized. 46 Plates in long bones can change elasticity and increase risk for peri-implant fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%