1961
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(61)91085-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Parents Who Have Had One Child With Down's Syndrome (Mongolism) Having Another Child Similarly Affected

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

1963
1963
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests somatic mosaicism for trisomy 21 in the parents and possibly a concomitant presence of mosaicism in the ovary. In addition, the recurrence risk of trisomy 21 to a sibling is elevated, particularly for young mothers ( Carter and Evans 1961; Richards 1977; Stene et al 1984). In a few families examined by ovarian biopsy, trisomic cell lines in the ovaries have been detected ( Nielsen et al 1988; Tseng et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This suggests somatic mosaicism for trisomy 21 in the parents and possibly a concomitant presence of mosaicism in the ovary. In addition, the recurrence risk of trisomy 21 to a sibling is elevated, particularly for young mothers ( Carter and Evans 1961; Richards 1977; Stene et al 1984). In a few families examined by ovarian biopsy, trisomic cell lines in the ovaries have been detected ( Nielsen et al 1988; Tseng et al 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the frequency of mongolism increases with increasing inaternal age (Penrose, 1933) it is assumed that the non-disjunction generally occurs during formation of the egg, rather than the sperm. Mongolism arising in this way is characteristically non-familial, the risk of recurrence in a subsequent child of the same parents being substantially the same as that for any mother of the same age (Carter and Evans, 1961). For a minority of parents of mongoloid children, however, the risk of recurrence in a subsequent child is substantially increased, for one of several possible reasons:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there is no indication of mosaicism in either parent, though this cannot be entirely excluded, the most likely reason for the birth of the twins in this case would be due to a chance event which is matemal-age dependant. The random risk for a mother aged 39 giving birth to a child with Down's syndrome lies between 1/260 and 1/100 (Carter and Evans, 1961), and the empirical recurrence risk approximately double this, though this may be increased for concurrent births due to environmental factors. The chance of dizygous twins being born in this country is approximately 1/100 (Carter, 1969), but this increases with maternal age and is expected to be approximately 1 in 60 in this case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%