2012
DOI: 10.1001/2012.jama.10857
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Risk of Malignancies in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated With Biologic Therapy

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
252
42
33
3

Citation Types

7
164
2
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
276
18
14
3

Relationship

0
311

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 311 publications

(184 citation statements)
references

References 103 publications

7
164
2
11
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Evidence is inconsistent as to whether the use of abatacept, compared with other b/tsDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of malignancy [27,28,[34][35][36]. Contrary to the results of previous population-based cohort studies, which included evaluations of all NMSC [35] and squamous cell skin cancer [37], no significantly increased risk of NMSC was observed with abatacept compared with other b/tsDMARDs in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Contrary to the results of previous population-based cohort studies, which included evaluations of all NMSC [35] and squamous cell skin cancer [37], no significantly increased risk of NMSC was observed with abatacept compared with other b/tsDMARDs in this study. The results of this study are consistent with those from a meta-analysis of clinical trials that showed b/tsDMARDs, including abatacept, were not significantly associated with an increased malignancy risk compared with csDMARDs or placebo [36]. Previous interventional trials and real-world analyses of abatacept demonstrated a similar malignancy risk of abatacept compared with placebo or other comparators [27,28,34].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Evidence is inconsistent as to whether the use of abatacept, compared with other b/tsDMARDs, is associated with an increased risk of malignancy [27,28,[34][35][36]. Contrary to the results of previous population-based cohort studies, which included evaluations of all NMSC [35] and squamous cell skin cancer [37], no significantly increased risk of NMSC was observed with abatacept compared with other b/tsDMARDs in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
contrasting
confidence: 95%
“…Contrary to the results of previous population-based cohort studies, which included evaluations of all NMSC [35] and squamous cell skin cancer [37], no significantly increased risk of NMSC was observed with abatacept compared with other b/tsDMARDs in this study. The results of this study are consistent with those from a meta-analysis of clinical trials that showed b/tsDMARDs, including abatacept, were not significantly associated with an increased malignancy risk compared with csDMARDs or placebo [36]. Previous interventional trials and real-world analyses of abatacept demonstrated a similar malignancy risk of abatacept compared with placebo or other comparators [27,28,34].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 87%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…In our study, the IR for malignancy was 1.06/100 PY in patients with RA treated using IL-6is. Our results are consistent with those of previous studies ( 16 ).…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 94%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Our data does not predict increased incidence of EBV associated lymphoma in RA patients under Tocilizumab therapy. This seems to be in accordance with safety data: a meta-analysis did not show LPD enhancement under Tocilizumab, even after one year [ 38 ]. Only one case of EBV reactivation has been described in Japan under Tocilizumab therapy [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 88%