2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05930-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of heart failure after systemic treatment for early breast cancer: results of a cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with those reported by a meta-analysis of eight RCTs comparing upfront adjuvant aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen, which showed a 19% (7–34%) increased risk of CV events in women treated with aromatase inhibitors, as well as with those of other “real life” registers reported in the recent literature [ 25 ]. A recent study conducted in the UK showed that breast cancer women without previous CV diseases treated with aromatase inhibitors had higher risk of heart failure (HR = 2.80, 1.29 to 6.08) than those treated with tamoxifen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These results are consistent with those reported by a meta-analysis of eight RCTs comparing upfront adjuvant aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen, which showed a 19% (7–34%) increased risk of CV events in women treated with aromatase inhibitors, as well as with those of other “real life” registers reported in the recent literature [ 25 ]. A recent study conducted in the UK showed that breast cancer women without previous CV diseases treated with aromatase inhibitors had higher risk of heart failure (HR = 2.80, 1.29 to 6.08) than those treated with tamoxifen.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Reversibility of cardiac toxicity in our patients was lower than reported in the adjuvant trastuzumab trials [ [1] , [2] , [3] , [4] ]. The principal explanation for this discrepancy could rely on slight inconsistency in the definition of cardiac recovery in the medical literature, as consensus on the definition for cardiotoxicity is still lacking [ [11] , [12] , [13] ]. The adjuvant trastuzumab trials themselves used slightly different definitions of cardiac recovery [ 3 , 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the proportion of patients who recovered in our study is closer to the one described in the real-world study OHERA (67.3%; “patients with significant LVEF drop who achieved resolution” in Table 2 ). Furthermore, a recent cohort study reported that one-third of the population who developed cardiac toxicity after trastuzumab had long-term impaired cardiac function [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analysis with tamoxifen exposure as comparator, AI exposure was associated with increased risk for coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, and heart failure, whereas this relationship was diminished when no endocrine therapy was used as comparator [14]. On the other hand, Jacobse et al investigated the risk for heart failure in a population-based cohort of 10 209 breast cancer patients and found that AI exposure was associated with increased risk for heart failure compared to no endocrine therapy [12]. Our results, showing lack of association between AI exposure and CVD outcomes in the analysis including the whole study cohort, are consistent with most of the previously published observational studies comparing AI with no endocrine treatment [12e14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses of RCTs investigating toxicity of extended adjuvant AI compared with no treatment have shown conflicting results with increased risk for CVD with AIs in one [ 9 ], but no difference in two other meta-analyses [ 10 , 11 ]. Regarding real-world evidence on CVD risk due to AIs compared to patients without endocrine therapy, few studies are published so far, with conflicting evidence [ [12] , [13] , [14] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%