2020
DOI: 10.55460/q4g3-feqr
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of Harm Associated With Using Rapid Sequence Induction Intubation and Positive Pressure Ventilation in Patients With Hemorrhagic Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9 This would allow for the prioritization of whole blood infusion, which would save time and mitigate the physiologic effects of a subsequent rapid sequence induction and positive pressure ventilation. 8 In addition, permissive hypoventilation may increase blood pressure by maintaining negative intrathoracic pressure and increasing venous return to the heart. 8,9 An initial study showed that spontaneous ventilation in porcine hemorrhage increased cardiac output and decreased lactate compared with positive pressure ventilation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…9 This would allow for the prioritization of whole blood infusion, which would save time and mitigate the physiologic effects of a subsequent rapid sequence induction and positive pressure ventilation. 8 In addition, permissive hypoventilation may increase blood pressure by maintaining negative intrathoracic pressure and increasing venous return to the heart. 8,9 An initial study showed that spontaneous ventilation in porcine hemorrhage increased cardiac output and decreased lactate compared with positive pressure ventilation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, it has been proposed that tracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation should not be used in patients with hemorrhagic shock. 8 However, the consequences of not intubating have not been fully investigated. It is possible that permissive hypoventilation, refraining from tracheal intubation and positive pressure ventilation and instead accepting spontaneous ventilation, may be preferable in severe hemorrhage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a patient with shock, rapid sequence intubation or positive pressure ventilation increases the burden of shock due to decreased cardiac output and increasing oxygen debt leading to organ dysfunction and coagulopathy. 9 Hence hemodynamic compromise and cardiac arrest should be managed with fluid, blood, and vasopressor before induction and intubation. 10 That patient in hemorrhagic shock with intact airways and who can maintain adequate oxygenation strategy of delayed intubation should be strongly adviced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%