2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of depression enhances auditory Pitch discrimination in the brain as indexed by the mismatch negativity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
53
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
7
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Presence of the MMNm Significant differences were found between standard and deviant ERFs in the 100-250 ms poststimulus time window for all features in both conditions (Figure 3). The differences were present bilaterally, were largest over right temporal gradiometers, and showed a polarity-as observed in the magnetometers-consistent with previous reports of the MMNm (e.g., Bonetti, Haumann, Vuust, Kliuchko, & Brattico, 2017) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Meg Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Presence of the MMNm Significant differences were found between standard and deviant ERFs in the 100-250 ms poststimulus time window for all features in both conditions (Figure 3). The differences were present bilaterally, were largest over right temporal gradiometers, and showed a polarity-as observed in the magnetometers-consistent with previous reports of the MMNm (e.g., Bonetti, Haumann, Vuust, Kliuchko, & Brattico, 2017) (Figure 4).…”
Section: Meg Experimentssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Deficits in mismatch processing were confirmed in subsequent investigations (Chen et al, 2015;Qiao et al, 2013). In contrast, other studies reported increased MMN amplitudes in patients with depression (He et al, 2010;Kähkönen et al, 2007) as well as an association between the risk for depression and higher MMN amplitudes in a subclinical sample (Bonetti, Haumann, Vuust, Kliuchko, & Brattico, 2017). In contrast, other studies reported increased MMN amplitudes in patients with depression (He et al, 2010;Kähkönen et al, 2007) as well as an association between the risk for depression and higher MMN amplitudes in a subclinical sample (Bonetti, Haumann, Vuust, Kliuchko, & Brattico, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…For instance, Pang et al (2014) found impaired MMN to sad syllables, whereas happy, angry, and neutral deviants were not processed differently in patients compared to healthy individuals. In contrast, other studies reported increased MMN amplitudes in patients with depression (He et al, 2010;Kähkönen et al, 2007) as well as an association between the risk for depression and higher MMN amplitudes in a subclinical sample (Bonetti, Haumann, Vuust, Kliuchko, & Brattico, 2017). Mu et al (2016) investigated mismatch responses to musical features and found increased timbre-MMN in depression but no differences for the remaining five sound features.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…While Study 1 and Study 2 showed that the SCA method can be applied to isolate a specific component of interest in single-subject measurements, it remains to be verified whether SCA is a reliable method for the study of inter-individual differences measurable in a specific component. In particular, we tested whether the previous findings of increased MMN amplitude to pitch and slide deviants measured in the MEG gradiometers in subjects with higher traits of depression (Bonetti et al, 2017) could be replicated with the SCA method.…”
Section: Interim Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in our third study we tested whether previous findings of individual differences in MMN amplitude related to depressive traits analyzed using conventional functional localizers (Bonetti et al, 2017) could be replicated with the novel SCA method.…”
Section: Research Questions and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 96%