Abstract:Background and Aim
Appendectomy is associated with various diseases, but whether it increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis aimed at investigating the suggested correlation between appendectomy and CRC.
Methods
Systematic retrieval was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, Web of Science, and http://ClinicalTrials.gov databases up to May 4, 2022, for studies reported the influence of appendectomy on CRC, colon cancer (C… Show more
“…A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis performed by Liu et al 15 . described findings similar to the trends described above, finding an overall OR of 1.31; 1.05–1.62 for CRC in the combined post‐appendectomy populations.…”
Section: Epidemiological Observation Of the Relationship Between Prev...supporting
confidence: 71%
“…A recent systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Liu et al 15 described findings similar to the trends described above, finding an overall OR of 1.31; 1.05-1.62 for CRC in the combined post-appendectomy populations. They further conducted a subgroup analysis based on geographical populations and concluded that the trend toward increased OR for CRC post-appendectomy was significant in American and Asian populations (OR 1.68; 1.15-2.44 and OR 1.46; 1.04-2.05, respectively), but not significant in European populations (OR 0.94; 0.87-1.02).…”
Section: Epidemiological Observation Of the Relationship Between Prev...supporting
The role of appendectomy in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a recent topic of contention. Given that appendectomy remains one of the most commonly performed operations and a first‐line management strategy of acute appendicitis, it is inherently crucial to elucidate the association between prior appendectomy and subsequent development of CRC, as there may be long‐term health repercussions. In this review, we summarize the data behind the relationship of CRC in post‐appendectomy patients, discuss the role of the microbiome in relation to appendectomy and CRC pathogenesis, and provide an appraisal of our current understanding of the function of the appendix. We seek to piece together the current landscape surrounding the microbiome and immunological changes in the colon post‐appendectomy and suggest a direction for future research involving molecular, transcriptomic, and immunologic analysis to complement our current understanding of the alterations in gut microbiome.
“…A recent systematic review and meta‐analysis performed by Liu et al 15 . described findings similar to the trends described above, finding an overall OR of 1.31; 1.05–1.62 for CRC in the combined post‐appendectomy populations.…”
Section: Epidemiological Observation Of the Relationship Between Prev...supporting
confidence: 71%
“…A recent systematic review and meta-analysis performed by Liu et al 15 described findings similar to the trends described above, finding an overall OR of 1.31; 1.05-1.62 for CRC in the combined post-appendectomy populations. They further conducted a subgroup analysis based on geographical populations and concluded that the trend toward increased OR for CRC post-appendectomy was significant in American and Asian populations (OR 1.68; 1.15-2.44 and OR 1.46; 1.04-2.05, respectively), but not significant in European populations (OR 0.94; 0.87-1.02).…”
Section: Epidemiological Observation Of the Relationship Between Prev...supporting
The role of appendectomy in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC) is a recent topic of contention. Given that appendectomy remains one of the most commonly performed operations and a first‐line management strategy of acute appendicitis, it is inherently crucial to elucidate the association between prior appendectomy and subsequent development of CRC, as there may be long‐term health repercussions. In this review, we summarize the data behind the relationship of CRC in post‐appendectomy patients, discuss the role of the microbiome in relation to appendectomy and CRC pathogenesis, and provide an appraisal of our current understanding of the function of the appendix. We seek to piece together the current landscape surrounding the microbiome and immunological changes in the colon post‐appendectomy and suggest a direction for future research involving molecular, transcriptomic, and immunologic analysis to complement our current understanding of the alterations in gut microbiome.
“…Several studies have investigated the relationship between appendectomy and CRC risk, with some showing an increased risk of CRC after appendectomy, while others have either found no association or a potential protective effect. In a meta-analysis, individuals who had experienced an appendectomy had an elevated risk of CRC, implying a possible link with CRC development [ 7 ]. Conversely, a 14 years of follow-up large retrospective cohort study found that appendectomy patients had a 1.14 times higher risk of developing CRC than the general population [ 37 ].…”
Objectives
The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) has exhibited regional variability in North Africa and the Middle East, with a steady increase in Algeria. Despite this trend, limited data exist on the epidemiology of CRC in northwestern Algeria. Our study aimed to investigate the epidemiological characteristics of CRC in this region.
Methods
We conducted a retrospective study examining 255 confirmed CRC cases through medical records from patients at the Sidi Bel Abbes anti-cancer centre.
Results
The mean age of the study participants was 59 ± 13 years. The results showed a higher incidence in males (57%) than in females, and colon (62%) than rectal cancer. Within this cohort, 47% had a pre-existing medical condition, while 39% had a family history of cancer. Adenocarcinomas were the prevailing histological subtype in 94% of CRC cases. Compared with colon cancer, rectal cancer was less often diagnosed at stage IV of the disease (OR = 0.75; 95% CI = 0.09, 4.86;
p
= 0.8) and more likely in early-onset patients (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = 1.25, 4.17;
p
= 0.007). Men were at a higher risk of being diagnosed with metastatic CRC primarily hepatic metastases (OR = 2.03; 95% CI = 1.07, 3.99;
p
= 0.033) and pulmonary metastases (OR = 2.50; 95% CI = 1.07, 6.59;
p
= 0.045).
Conclusion
This study may provide a comprehensive glimpse into CRC epidemiology in northwest Algeria. Understanding regional differences is the key to implementing specific preventive and interventional strategies.
“…Considering the appendix's role in immune functions, it is essential to evaluate whether its presence or absence is linked to the development of other diseases, including colorectal cancer, inflammatory diseases, and infections [5]. The outcomes of previous studies in this area have been inconsistent [6][7][8][9][10][11]. Consequently, a comprehensive review study is needed to amalgamate these findings.…”
Aim. Given the potential for physiological alterations in the gastrointestinal tract following appendix removal, which may influence carcinogenesis, we embarked on a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the possible association between appendectomy and the subsequent risk of colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods. Our systematic investigation utilized sources including the Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science, covering research up to February 1, 2023. We assessed the impact of appendectomy on colorectal cancer, employing a random effects model to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for developing CRC post-appendectomy and its 95 % confidence interval (CI).Results. This review and meta-analysis incorporated a total of 10 studies, comprising 1,001,693 cases of appendectomy and 39,463 instances of CRC. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled HR of 1.04 (95 % CI: 1.0–1.08) for developing CRC following appendectomy. Notably, the HR for CRC development increased to 1.20 (95 % CI: 0.69–1.69) when considering only cases with more than 10 years of follow-up.Conclusion. The findings indicate a marginally increased risk of colorectal cancer in cases without a specified follow-up period. However, this elevated risk did not persist over the long term (exceeding 10 years). The heterogeneity of the included studies appears to have influenced our results. Nevertheless, it is advisable for physicians to weigh the potential benefits of alternative therapies and consider the future complications that may arise from an unnecessary appendectomy.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.