2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of collision between service vessels and offshore wind turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These larger vessels ( $ 50 m) have better operational capability than conventional CTVs and are generally equipped with dynamic positioning systems. Additionally, motioncompensating gangways are typically installed on OAVs in order to transfer technicians on the wind turbine in rough weather, in which CTVs cannot operate (Dai et al, 2013;O'Connor et al, 2013). Cranes on these vessels provide ability to transfer medium weight components from vessels' deck directly to offshore wind turbine platforms.…”
Section: Transportation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These larger vessels ( $ 50 m) have better operational capability than conventional CTVs and are generally equipped with dynamic positioning systems. Additionally, motioncompensating gangways are typically installed on OAVs in order to transfer technicians on the wind turbine in rough weather, in which CTVs cannot operate (Dai et al, 2013;O'Connor et al, 2013). Cranes on these vessels provide ability to transfer medium weight components from vessels' deck directly to offshore wind turbine platforms.…”
Section: Transportation Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the worst case scenarios, maritime accidents may not only damage the vessels, but also the turbines-leading to further downtime and increased repair costs, thereby reducing the reliability of offshore wind even further. According to the findings of Dai et al (2013), a fairly small support vessel with 230 tones displacement, colliding head-on with the landing structure on a turbine tower at a speed of just 0.48 m/s, would be enough to induce local yield in the structure; colliding a speed of 0.84 m/s with the landing structure would induce global yield. Conversely, the same vessel colliding head-on directly with the tower would cause local yield and global yield at speeds of 0.34 m/s and 0.55 m/s respectively.…”
Section: The Need For Maritime Risk Assessment and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, causation probabilities are often calculated through sophisticated risk assessment methods such as Fault Trees, Event Tress (Fowler and Sørgård 2000;Haugen 1991) and Bayesian Networks (Akhtar and Utne 2013;Dai et al 2013;Hänninen et al 2013;Hänninen and Kujala 2012;Szwed et al 2006;Friis-Hansen 2000;Friis-Hansen and Simonsen 2002). Using risk assessment methods can allow various factors-such as human and organizational errors, configuration of the navigational area, navigational aids and markings, bathymetry, and coastal state features such as VTS-to be taken into consideration (Friis-Hansen 2008).…”
Section: Causation Probability Of Accidentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast to bridge resources management (BRM), engine room resource management has to a limited extent been exploited, neither in practice nor in the investigation of the accidents (Hetherington et al 2006). Violation of procedure and drifting operational practice in the merchant fleet has been reported in other studies as well (Dai et al 2013;Oltedal 2012;Antonsen 2009b) and may be expected if procedures, instructions, or checklists are considered inefficient or meaningless by the crew. In this study, we also found that a high number of causal factors were coded to section 7 of the ISM code representing lack of or poor instructions, procedures, and/or checklists.…”
Section: Coding To Hfacs and Cross-tabulationmentioning
confidence: 99%