2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.04.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of cellular phone interference with an implantable loop recorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients with such a device should be advised to keep portable headphones at least 3–5 cm away from their device. In the mid‐1990s, several investigators reported EMI effects on CRMs in vitro and in vivo, such as temporary output inhibition due to oversensing of emitted electrical signals from the cell phone, noise reversion or asynchronous pacing, and unwanted ventricular tracking from cell‐phone signals detected by the atrial lead [Trigano et al, , ]. However, one study showed that it is rare for patients with PM to be severely affected by a mobile phone unless the phone is positioned in the pocket over the pulse generator [Irnich et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with such a device should be advised to keep portable headphones at least 3–5 cm away from their device. In the mid‐1990s, several investigators reported EMI effects on CRMs in vitro and in vivo, such as temporary output inhibition due to oversensing of emitted electrical signals from the cell phone, noise reversion or asynchronous pacing, and unwanted ventricular tracking from cell‐phone signals detected by the atrial lead [Trigano et al, , ]. However, one study showed that it is rare for patients with PM to be severely affected by a mobile phone unless the phone is positioned in the pocket over the pulse generator [Irnich et al, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) in the U.K. carried out an EMI test on medical equipment using different mobile communication devices and showed that anesthesia machines, respirators, external pacemakers, ECG monitors, defibrillators, infusion pumps, and ventilators are sensitive to EMI. [ 7 8 9 ] Moreover, there are several reports published about EMI problems attributed to the use of a mobile phone near a medical device. Hann et al ., reported the prompted malfunction of an epinephrine infusion pump due to a cellular phone received call.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common knowledge that the presence of electromagnetic interferences is involved in a wide range of devices dysfunction [1][2][3]. Specific settings of pacemaker (PM) are required in order to reduce interference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%