2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of cancer after an acute coronary syndrome according to the type of P2Y12 inhibitor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The smaller prevalence in our study could be attributed to the difference in the study population between our study and the previous study (i.e., ACS only vs. ischemic heart disease including acute and chronic coronary syndrome, respectively). Another singlecenter prospective study of 1,819 patients with ACS showed a cancer prevalence of 3.4%, 8 and a retrospective study including 6,068 patients showed a prevalence of 9.6%, 26 which is almost consistent with the result of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The smaller prevalence in our study could be attributed to the difference in the study population between our study and the previous study (i.e., ACS only vs. ischemic heart disease including acute and chronic coronary syndrome, respectively). Another singlecenter prospective study of 1,819 patients with ACS showed a cancer prevalence of 3.4%, 8 and a retrospective study including 6,068 patients showed a prevalence of 9.6%, 26 which is almost consistent with the result of our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Also concerning ticagrelor, PEGASUS-TIMI 54 trial showed an enhanced cancer risk of ticagrelor administered beyond 1 year, whereas PLATO was negative [152,178,179]. Interestingly Raposeiras-Roubin et al performed a retrospective study on 4229 consecutive acute coronary syndrome patients with a median follow up of 46 months [140]. They found that ticagrelor resulted in a lower cancer risk than clopidogrel without difference between clopidogrel and prasugrel.…”
Section: Are Anti P2y 12 Agents Protective or At Risk For Increased Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, a retrospective registry study assessed the risk of de novo cancer diagnosis in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients discharged from a tertiary hospital with DAPT with either aspirin and clopidogrel, or aspirin and prasugrel, or aspirin and ticagrelor [79]. Among 4229 consecutive ACS patients, 311 were diagnosed with de novo cancer during a median follow-up of 46.2-months.…”
Section: The Chemoprotective Effect Of Other Antiplatelet Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cumulative incidence of cancer was 2.2 per 100 patients per year for clopidogrel users, compared to 1.6 per 100 patients per year for prasugrel users, and 0.3 per 100 patients per year for ticagrelor users. In multivariate and propensity score analyses, ticagrelor use was associated with a lower risk of de novo cancer diagnosis compared to clopidogrel or prasugrel use (adjusted HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05–0.90; p = 0.036), regardless of DAPT duration [79].…”
Section: The Chemoprotective Effect Of Other Antiplatelet Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%