2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk of a Second Primary Cancer after Non-melanoma Skin Cancer in White Men and Women: A Prospective Cohort Study

Abstract: Studies have suggested a positive association between history of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and risk of subsequent cancer at other sites. This prospective study found a modestly increased risk of subsequent malignancies among individuals with a history of NMSC, specifically breast and lung cancer in women and melanoma in both men and women.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
63
2
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
63
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we were able to investigate the association among both women and men with a larger sample size and further differentiate between BCC and SCC based on detailed cohort follow-up information. We found that participants with a history of both BCC and SCC had a more apparently increased risk of melanoma when compared with participants with a history of BCC or SCC alone, thus adding further evidence to our previous report on the association between KC history and melanoma in the NHS and HPFS (18). However, the statistical test for the heterogeneity between history of BCC or SCC alone and history of both BCC and SCC did not reach statistical significance, and further studies are needed to confirm our findings.…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we were able to investigate the association among both women and men with a larger sample size and further differentiate between BCC and SCC based on detailed cohort follow-up information. We found that participants with a history of both BCC and SCC had a more apparently increased risk of melanoma when compared with participants with a history of BCC or SCC alone, thus adding further evidence to our previous report on the association between KC history and melanoma in the NHS and HPFS (18). However, the statistical test for the heterogeneity between history of BCC or SCC alone and history of both BCC and SCC did not reach statistical significance, and further studies are needed to confirm our findings.…”
Section: Articlesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Our previous study has reported an increased risk of cancer including melanoma in association with history of KC in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS;1984-2008 and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS;1986-2008 (18). However, this previous report did not examine the detailed subgroups of KC in association with the risk of developing melanoma and melanoma subtypes, did not investigate the impact of multiple KCs on melanoma risk, and did not investigate the potential modification of the KC-melanoma association by other melanoma risk factors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Song et al found a relative risk for development of MM after diagnosis of a NMSC of 1.99 for men and 2.58 for women. 118 These data were based on 2 large prospective cohort studies with 46,237 men and 107,339 women under study. A smaller study including 3548 people found the relative risk for MM to be 3.28 after diagnosis of BCC.…”
Section: Follow-up and Reducing Risk For Future Skin Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[116][117][118][119]123,[125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140][141] …”
Section: Follow-up and Reducing Risk For Future Skin Cancersunclassified
“…Comparatively large individual studies investigating this question include two local UK registry-based studies (6,7), a nationwide study in Finland (8), and a US prospective cohort study of health professionals (9), all of which showed significant increases in a range of cancers after NMSC. Another UK registrybased study, however, showed no such increased risks and indeed significant risk reductions in certain cancers, including of the breast and prostate (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%