Risk model–based lung cancer screening

Nierengarten, Mary Beth

doi:10.1002/cncr.34832

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 3 publications

(5 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 24 , 25 , 26 Most patients with malignant tumors have bad living habits such as smoking, alcoholism, eating high energy and high fat, or malignant tumors in their tissues caused by exogenous factors such as external environmental stimuli, or malignant tumors in their local tissues caused by endogenous factors such as genetic factors, congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, and endocrine disorders. 27 The clinical manifestations of patients with malignant tumors are mainly divided into local and systemic manifestations. The local manifestations were mainly mass formed by malignant proliferation of tumor cells, pain, ulcer, hemorrhage and obstruction caused by compression and stimulation of peripheral nerves due to tumor growth.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of skinfold thickness on arm venous access port in cancer patients

Liu,

Li,

Liu

et al. 2023

Skin Research and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundCurrently, skinfold thickness in studies on arm venous access ports and the effect of venous access port application are unknown.Materials and MethodsA total of 256 cancer patients who underwent primary venous access port placement in the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from September 2022 to March 2023 were selected as the study subjects. Two hundred fifty‐six patients were divided into normal skinfold thickness group and high skinfold thickness group according to skinfold thickness. The success rate of primary catheterization of arm venous port catheterization, catheterization operation time, catheterization length and incidence rate of adverse reactions were compared.ResultsThere was no significant difference in the basic data between the two groups. There was no significant difference in the success rate of primary catheterization between the two groups (p > 0.05), the catheterization operation time in the normal skinfold thickness group was significantly lower than that in the high skinfold thickness group (p < 0.05), the total length of the implanted catheter in the normal skinfold thickness group was significantly lower than that in the high skinfold thickness group (p < 0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions in the normal skinfold thickness group was significantly lower than that in the high skinfold thickness group (p < 0.05).ConclusionIn cancer patients, skinfold thickness can significantly affect the application effect of arm venous port, and normal skinfold thickness for arm venous port has shorter operation time, total length of implanted catheter and lower incidence of adverse reactions.

show abstract