2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk managements' communicative effects influencing IT project success

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…De Bakker et al (2011Bakker et al ( , 2012 argue that individual risk management activities generate communicative effects which contribute to the effectiveness of instrumental actions and thus to projectsuccess.Thiscommunicativeeffect,notconsideredbythepositivisttradition,isasignificant componentofthepost-positivistview,andcreatesthecontextwhichinfluencesthesetting,itselfan integralcomponentofactivitythatcannotbeignored.Thisstudytakesthepost-positivistviewofthe worldasopentointerpretationinlinewiththeobservationsofKrane, Olsson,andRolstadås(2012) regardingdifferentperspectivesofriskheldbyprojectteamsandprojectowners.Theunderstanding ofriskintheautomotiveprojectenvironmentcanbeenhancedbytheprojectstakeholders'subjective The projects which serve as context for the case study are the implementation of SAP -a mainstreamEnterpriseResourcePlanning(ERP)system-inseveralmanufacturingfacilitiesinEurope, andthelaunchpreparationforserialproductionofnewdriverassistancesystemsforinternational carmakers.Theunitofanalysisistheentireorganisation.FollowingYin's(2012)distinctionsof designsforcasestudies,theonechoseninthisresearchisholisticasopposedtoembedded,inwhich morethanoneunitoftheorganisationaretheunitsofanalysis (Saunders,Lewis,&Thornhill,2009 …”
Section: Overview Of the Research Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De Bakker et al (2011Bakker et al ( , 2012 argue that individual risk management activities generate communicative effects which contribute to the effectiveness of instrumental actions and thus to projectsuccess.Thiscommunicativeeffect,notconsideredbythepositivisttradition,isasignificant componentofthepost-positivistview,andcreatesthecontextwhichinfluencesthesetting,itselfan integralcomponentofactivitythatcannotbeignored.Thisstudytakesthepost-positivistviewofthe worldasopentointerpretationinlinewiththeobservationsofKrane, Olsson,andRolstadås(2012) regardingdifferentperspectivesofriskheldbyprojectteamsandprojectowners.Theunderstanding ofriskintheautomotiveprojectenvironmentcanbeenhancedbytheprojectstakeholders'subjective The projects which serve as context for the case study are the implementation of SAP -a mainstreamEnterpriseResourcePlanning(ERP)system-inseveralmanufacturingfacilitiesinEurope, andthelaunchpreparationforserialproductionofnewdriverassistancesystemsforinternational carmakers.Theunitofanalysisistheentireorganisation.FollowingYin's(2012)distinctionsof designsforcasestudies,theonechoseninthisresearchisholisticasopposedtoembedded,inwhich morethanoneunitoftheorganisationaretheunitsofanalysis (Saunders,Lewis,&Thornhill,2009 …”
Section: Overview Of the Research Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The management communication risk indicator code was assigned to the following text: "We need to have management prioritization to help people know what to work on and in what order." The objectives and tasks of strategic projects are highly dependent on management, and clear communication of the project priorities, task division, and team responsibilities are important to prevent risks to projects from occurring (De Bakker et al, 2012). Inadequate management communication has also been found to cause project schedule overruns (Herroelen, 2005;Love and Smith, 2003).…”
Section: Macro Codesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of preemptive project management strategies has been shown to reduce project risk events (Miller and Lessard, 2001). A good understanding of risk events can help project managers create more informed risk management plans and can lead to reduced project risk (De Bakker et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with the growth of the software industry, more and more problems come along with the increasing quantity and scale in the development of software projects. Compared with any other project, the successful rate of the software project largely reduces which forces many enterprises to suffer big lose [1][2][3]. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze and control the software project risk aiming to complete the software project as planned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%