2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0098-1354(00)00388-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk management in the development of new products in highly regulated industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Project prioritization and new product-portfolio selection has long been the domain of the new product arm of the corporation (Blau et al, 2000). Pharmaceutical product development, as any other management task, requires important decisions about the tradeoffs between the available resources, as managers decide which drugs to bring to market (Ogawa & Piller, 2006).…”
Section: Risk Management Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Project prioritization and new product-portfolio selection has long been the domain of the new product arm of the corporation (Blau et al, 2000). Pharmaceutical product development, as any other management task, requires important decisions about the tradeoffs between the available resources, as managers decide which drugs to bring to market (Ogawa & Piller, 2006).…”
Section: Risk Management Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These NPV based methods include Net Present Value of Income analysis, Capacity Constrained NPV approach, and Stochastic Dominance. All of the above methods account for the financial impact of the chosen alternatives (Grabowski & Vernon, 1998;Blau et al, 2000;Smit & Trigeorgis, 2006). The Consumer Theory based approaches do not take into account the financial aspects of the new product development and analyze consumers' preferences for different product alternatives instead.…”
Section: Risk Management Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The failure of a single required test may prevent a potential product from reaching the marketplace. An informal overview of the importance of including the possibility of technical failure into planning is given in Blau et al (2000), who focus especially on the pharmaceutical industry. DiMasi (2001) also refers to economic, efficacy, safety and "other" reasons for cutting projects.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most of the products of this sector are global ones, which means costs of R&D are "global joint costs" [2]. On the other hand, since it is essential for health to ensure a high degree of public health and keep public expenditure under control, the pharmaceutical sector is highly regulated [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%