Public Procurement for Innovation 2015
DOI: 10.4337/9781783471898.00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk management in public procurement of innovation: a conceptualization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less attention, they argue, is given to the wider systemic sources of capacity. Indeed a number of studies (Edelenbos and Teisman, 2008;Edler et al, 2015;Rolfstam, 2013;Uyarra et al, 2014;Edquist et al, 2015;Edler and Yeow, 2016) have pointed to institutional, governance and capability related obstacles to the implementation of PPI. These include institutional challenges such as decentralized or 'silo' budgets, lack of a systemic view or internal coordination (between the internal end user or those responsible to deliver the service, and the procurers) and capacity and resource constraints in contracting authorities.…”
Section: -Public Procurement and Innovation A Missing Geographicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less attention, they argue, is given to the wider systemic sources of capacity. Indeed a number of studies (Edelenbos and Teisman, 2008;Edler et al, 2015;Rolfstam, 2013;Uyarra et al, 2014;Edquist et al, 2015;Edler and Yeow, 2016) have pointed to institutional, governance and capability related obstacles to the implementation of PPI. These include institutional challenges such as decentralized or 'silo' budgets, lack of a systemic view or internal coordination (between the internal end user or those responsible to deliver the service, and the procurers) and capacity and resource constraints in contracting authorities.…”
Section: -Public Procurement and Innovation A Missing Geographicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conflict of interest might affect the rules of public procurement in terms of transparency and, in particular, of equal opportunities of access for every market player. There is no doubt it is very difficult to combine these rules with the interest of industrial and research players (Edler, 2008;Edler et al, 2006;Georgiou, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such decline is confirmed by statistics and empirical evidence, showing that procurement in the EU is taken into account four times less than in the US in civilian sectors and two times less in defence (Directors Forum, 2006). This trend was discontinued in the mid 2000s, as a new interest has emerged in the context of demand-side approaches to innovation and, more concretely, in the use of public demand as an engine for innovation in some EU Member States (Edler et al 2006). The emphasis has been put on the link between procurement and perceived under-investment in R&D by the business sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primarily, such incremental innovations and adaptations of already existing products entail a much lower development risk and are less prone to failure. Also, as these technologies are already better understood than radically new approaches, they are easier to control and describe (Edler, Rolfstam, Tsipouri and Uyarra, 2015).…”
Section: Scope Of Public Procurement As Innovation Policy Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, risk aversion among public procurers constitutes a main bottleneck. This might be the result of a reluctance to change that is inherent in administrative institutions (Edler et al, 2015). Even more decisive, however, is a skewed incentive structure in the public sector.…”
Section: Scope Of Public Procurement As Innovation Policy Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%