Risk management in higher education research: a systematic literature review

Khaw, Tze Yin; Teoh, Ai Ping

doi:10.1108/qae-04-2022-0097

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 53 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, it has gained widespread adoption among researchers from diverse academic domains. Its applications extend to investigations into digital technology learning (Ahmad et al, 2022), competitive analyses within the financial sector (Nisa et al, 2022), risk management strategies (Khaw and Teoh, 2023) and the exploration of interventions targeting consumer behavior (Reisch et al, 2021). Researchers use the ROSES protocol with the primary objective of ensuring the integrity and reliability of their research reviews.…”

Section: Methodology 21 the Review Protocol -Rosesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Building a thematic framework of cybersecurity: a systematic literature review approach

Khaw,

Amran,

Teoh

2024

JSIT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to explore the factors affecting cybersecurity implementation in organizations in various countries and develop a cybersecurity framework to improve cybersecurity practices within organizations for cybersecurity risk management through a systematic literature review (SLR) approach. Design/methodology/approach This SLR adhered to RepOrting Standards for Systematics Evidence Syntheses (ROSES) publication standards and used various research approaches. The study’s article selection process involved using Scopus, one of the most important scientific databases, to review articles published between 2014 and 2023. Findings This review identified the four main themes: individual factors, organizational factors, technological factors and governmental role. In addition, nine subthemes that relate to these primary topics were established. Originality/value This research sheds light on the multifaceted nature of cybersecurity by exploring factors influencing implementation and developing an improvement framework, offering valuable insights for researchers to advance theoretical developments, assisting industry practitioners in tailoring cybersecurity strategies to their needs and providing policymakers with a basis for creating more effective cybersecurity regulations and standards.

show abstract

Section: Methodology 21 the Review Protocol -Rosesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The research by Khan et al. (2022) critically delves into and assesses the prominent cybersecurity challenges confronted by organizations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Building a thematic framework of cybersecurity: a systematic literature review approach

Khaw,

Amran,

Teoh

2024

JSIT

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To locate the articles to include in this review, Web of Science and Scopus databases were used, like prior studies (Carvalho et al , 2022; de Mello Silva and de Vargas, 2022; Khaw and Teoh, 2023). Several variations and combinations of search terms were used, resulting in the final choice of "assur* of learning OR teaching quality* AND learn* standards, where these terms are widely used in association with AoL.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assurance of learning in business education – what exactly are we assuring, and whose business should it be?

Tham

Scheepers

Grace

et al. 2023

QAE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This paper aims to critically evaluate the evolution of Assurance of Learning (AoL) in business education and identify gaps and responsibilities in higher institution landscapes moving into the future. This comes amidst increasing structural reforms, an increasingly digitalised world, accelerated by the COVID-19 pandemic and wider scrutiny of graduate competencies for job readiness. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review comprising 27 journal articles published between 2018 and 2022 is the methodology used in this research. This approach is justified as it provides a recent synopsis of current trends on AoL and encompasses the changes over the course of the COVID-19-induced higher education landscapes. Findings The systematic literature review revealed a strong flavour for AoL measurement through the students' perspectives, with little emerging from faculty insights. Only six out of the 27 articles were framed in a non-English speaking background, revealing that most studies were still concentrated in a US or English environment. Also, while papers on AoL have increased in numbers from 2018 to 2022, there remains scant literature on AoL measurements related to the COVID-19 pandemic and recent digital technologies, and how these would have changed given the rapid shift to online or hybrid environments. Originality/value A comprehensive review of AoL literature from 2018 to 2022 is undertaken through Leximancer, which reveals conceptual and relational ties between core themes and concepts of interest. The findings inform business school leaders of the current state of AoL processes, by combining the views of students, faculty and managers.

show abstract

“…Most views define risk management as a process characteristic of such management, when they consider the process of influencing the object of management in order to find ways to reduce rather than prevent risk. This creates significant problems with avoiding future risks and leads to significant losses of resources and deterioration of the company's financial results (Falkner & Hiebl, 2015), (Khaw & Teoh, 2022).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Management Decision-Making as a Mechanism for Reducing the Level of Global Risk and Its Redistribution

Yatsyshyn

Kabachenko

Korchynska

et al. 2023

KJHSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Modern conditions of turbulence in the external economic environment require business structures not only to respond quickly to new challenges, but also to form scenario models of behaviour in order to maintain competitive market advantages based on an objective review of their own commercial potential and reserves. It is noteworthy that the internal risks of the business structure are the primary obstacle in the growth of the efficiency of the commercial structure and determine its level of profitability. The purpose of the research is to assess the factor of formation of biased management decisions and the features of their implementation as factors of reducing the manifestation of internal business risks. Indicated that the system of effective business management must always take into account the manifestation and pressure of internal risk due to a number of factors that cannot be accurately assessed. Modern methodology of project management and project management does not take into account the tool of biased decisions. Anti-crisis management is presented as a mandatory element of management knowledge. Therefore, the further development of management should focus on the adoption of biased management decisions and the development of mechanisms for their timely implementation.

show abstract

Risk management in higher education research: a systematic literature review

Cited by 6 publications

References 53 publications

Building a thematic framework of cybersecurity: a systematic literature review approach

Building a thematic framework of cybersecurity: a systematic literature review approach

Assurance of learning in business education – what exactly are we assuring, and whose business should it be?

Management Decision-Making as a Mechanism for Reducing the Level of Global Risk and Its Redistribution

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About