52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control 2013
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2013.6760666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk-limiting power grid control with an ARMA-based prediction model

Abstract: Abstract-This paper is concerned with the risk-limiting operation of electric power grids with stochastic uncertainties due to, for example, demand and integration of renewable generation. The main contribution is incorporating autoregressive-moving-average (ARMA) type prediction models for the underlying uncertainties into chance-constrained, finitehorizon optimal control. This uncertainty model leads to a more (compared to existing work in literature) careful treatment of correlation in time which is signifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. ., t + N − 1 and for all i > 1 in (13), and K k|t = K =− a/b for all k ≥ 0 in ( 14) and ( 16)) we obtain that, for all k ≥ t e k+1 = w k (27) which implies that Var{e t+k } = W and that e t ∈ [− w, w] for all k ≥ 0. Neglecting the recursive feasibility issues for simplicity, to enforce (8) for all possible realizations of w t+k .…”
Section: Analytic Reformulation For the Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…. ., t + N − 1 and for all i > 1 in (13), and K k|t = K =− a/b for all k ≥ 0 in ( 14) and ( 16)) we obtain that, for all k ≥ t e k+1 = w k (27) which implies that Var{e t+k } = W and that e t ∈ [− w, w] for all k ≥ 0. Neglecting the recursive feasibility issues for simplicity, to enforce (8) for all possible realizations of w t+k .…”
Section: Analytic Reformulation For the Motivating Examplementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The use of chance constrained optimization and stochastic MPC has been considered as a promising solution in a number of application domains, such as water reservoir management [5][6][7], temperature and HVAC control in buildings [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], process control [18][19][20][21][22], power production, management, and supply in systems with renewable energy sources [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34], cellular networks management [35], driver steering, scheduling, and energy management in vehicles [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44], path planning and formation control [45][46][47][48], air traffic control [49], inventory control and supply chain management [50][51]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CC-MPC uses an explicit probabilistic modeling of the system disturbances to calculate explicit bounds on the system constraint satisfaction. For instance, [26] presents a chanceconstrained two-stage stochastic program for unit commitment with uncertain wind power output and [27] shows an autoregressive-moving-average (ARMA) type prediction model for the underlying uncertainties (load/generation) into chance-constrained finite-horizon optimal control. An application of this technique in the context of the drinking water network of the city of Barcelona is reported in [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…problem with ramping constraints, energy storage and congested networks. Reference [11] incorporated auto-regressivemoving-average type prediction models into the risk-limiting control, while reference [12] considered optimal curtailing of intermittent sources. A risk-limiting optimal power flow problem for power systems with high penetration of wind power was formulated in reference [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%