2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk implications of renewable support instruments: Comparative analysis of feed-in tariffs and premiums using a mean–variance approach

Abstract:  Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example Kitzing [38] arrived for a Danish offshore case at a difference in required support levels of 5-10 EUR/MWh between FIT and FIP, however using a different approach, which is based on a mean-variance analysis and thus not fully comparable to this liquidity management approach.…”
Section: Results For Different Debt Sharesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Kitzing [38] arrived for a Danish offshore case at a difference in required support levels of 5-10 EUR/MWh between FIT and FIP, however using a different approach, which is based on a mean-variance analysis and thus not fully comparable to this liquidity management approach.…”
Section: Results For Different Debt Sharesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have before considered this software in many fields to develop a sensitivity analysis: life-cycle of green buildings [46], photovoltaic energy [47], electric feed-in tariffs [48] or repowering onshore wind farms [49]. In fact, a general approach of a sensitivity analysis of an offshore wind farm has been taken into account by Koukal et al [50].…”
Section: Sensitivity Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of the papers identified, while acknowledging the existence of barriers, mainly explore the differences between the effectiveness and efficiency of particular implemented policies (proposed solutions). For example, a number of papers [113][114][115][116] examine Feed-in-Tariffs, carbon tax, trading schemes, green certificates [117], energy performance contracts [118], and renewable standards. Indeed, two papers examine implemented policies to propose an optimal mix of policy solutions to enable the scaling up of renewable technology deployment [119,120], while one proposes a real options analysis tool for investors to use based on the different types of uncertainty they are faced with [47].…”
Section: Testing Barriers Through Implemented Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%