Risk Groups: Nursing Bottle Caries/Caries in the Elderly

Curzon, M.E.J.; Preston, Antony

doi:10.1159/000074359

Cited by 80 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 36 publications

(37 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Risk-oriented prevention has been advocated in dentistry, but there is no current standard practice to identify adult patients at high risk for RC [Bader et al, 2003;Jenson et al, 2007]. The idea of exploring risk indicators for predicting caries increment is not new [Beck et al, 1992;Powell, 1998], but research on developing models to identify high-risk adults for targeted caries prevention is scarce and inconclusive [Curzon and Preston, 2004;Griffin et al, 2004]. The aim of this paper is to identify prospective risk factors and baseline characteristics that are predictive of incident RC in high-risk adults.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to find the set of risk indicators best able to predict root caries (RC) incidence in caries-active adults utilizing data from the Xylitol for Adult Caries Trial (X-ACT). Five logistic regression models were compared with respect to their predictive performance for incident RC using data from placebo-control participants with exposed root surfaces at baseline and from two study centers with ancillary data collection (n = 155). Prediction performance was assessed from baseline variables and after including ancillary variables [smoking, diet, use of removable partial dentures (RPD), toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance]. A sensitivity analysis added treatment to the models for both the control and treatment participants (n = 301) to predict RC for the control participants. Forty-nine percent of the control participants had incident RC. The model including the number of follow-up years at risk, the number of root surfaces at risk, RC index, gender, race, age, and smoking resulted in the best prediction performance, having the highest AUC and lowest Brier score. The sensitivity analysis supported the primary analysis and gave slightly better performance summary measures. The set of risk indicators best able to predict RC incidence included an increased number of root surfaces at risk and increased RC index at baseline, followed by white race and nonsmoking, which were strong nonsignificant predictors. Gender, age, and increased number of follow-up years at risk, while included in the model, were also not statistically significant. The inclusion of health, diet, RPD use, toothbrush use, income, education, and dental insurance variables did not improve the prediction performance.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…5 years. This prevalence of caries ranges from 10.7 to 47% and the causes of this increase have not been clarified [Aligne et al, 2003;Curzon and Preston, 2004;Gadelha et al, 2005;van Palenstein et al, 2006;Yonezu et al, 2006]. Several reports have suggested that early mutans streptococcus colonization [Alaluusua and Renkonen, 1983], plaque accumulation on anterior oral surfaces [Alaluusua and Malmivirta, 1994], certain sociodemographic factors [Chu et al, 1999;Tiberia et al, 2007], as well as dietary and toothbrushing…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Allergic Rhinitis, Feeding and Oral Habits, Toothbrushing and Socioeconomic Status

Vázquez-Nava

Vázquez²,

Saldívar³

et al. 2008

Caries Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim was to determine the effect of feeding and oral habits, toothbrushing, socioeconomic status and allergic rhinitis on the development of dental caries in primary dentition. In a cross-sectional study, data were obtained by means of a structured questionnaire on 1,160 children, 4–5 years old (mean = 4.5 ± 0.5) and born in 1999, 2000 or 2001. The children also had a physical examination by an allergist and dentists. Dental caries was diagnosed according to WHO criteria. Caries experience was measured as number of deft and defs. Logistic regression analysis assessed the association between dental caries and independent variables. The dental caries prevalence was 17.9%, 28.8% of the children had allergic rhinitis symptoms, digit sucking was reported by 9.8% and pacifier use by 13.6% of the children. The mean number of deft of the sample was 1.02 (SD = 2.37) and that of defs was 1.33 (SD = 3.54). Analysis showed that breast-feeding for >12 months (p < 0.01), toothbrushing frequency (p < 0.01), sugar consumption (p < 0.01) and pacifier use (p < 0.01) each had a significant association with dental caries occurrence in primary dentition. Children with pacifier use and allergic rhinitis had more than double the risk of dental caries development. Allergic rhinitis alone has no effect on dental caries. Healthcare professionals attempting to limit dental caries should consider the effect of prolonged breast-feeding, sugary product consumption between meals and nonnutritive habits on dental caries.

show abstract

“…Während des Saugens wird der Nuckel an den Gaumen gedrückt und die Zunge bedeckt die unteren Milchschneidezähne. Die Lokalisation des Kariesbefalls ist somit typisch, da die oberen Frontzäh-ne während des Saugens von (zucker-/ säurehaltigen) Flüssigkeiten direkt umspült werden und der Speichelzutritt blockiert ist, wohingegen die unteren Frontzähne durch die Zunge gegen den Flüssig-keitszutritt weitgehend abgeschirmt sind und zusätzlich durch den Speichel aus den Speicheldrüsen geschützt werden [11].…”

Section: Zusammenfassung · Abstractunclassified

Interdisziplinäre Gesundheitsfrühförderung

Günay

Meyer

2010

Praev Gesundheitsf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die frühkindliche Karies (ECC) stellt ein ernsthaftes "Public-Health-Problem" mit einer Polarisierung der Karieslast in Richtung der niedrigen Sozialschichten dar. Bei diesen Risikogruppen ist die Individual-und Gruppenprophylaxe nicht ausreichend. Es bestehen Forderungen nach gezielter frühzeitiger Aufklärung und Ausbau spezifischer Prophylaxeprogramme. Um die ECC und deren Folgen zu minimieren muss ein systematisches Betreuungs-und Präventionskonzept schon in der Schwangerschaft beginnen. Viele Schwangere sind weder über orale Veränderungen in der Schwangerschaft, noch über Risiken und den Einfluss ihrer eigenen Mundgesundheit auf die Mund-und allgemeine Gesundheit des Kindes aufgeklärt. Hierzu ist eine Optimierung der Kooperation zwischen verschiedenen Berufsgruppen erforderlich.

show abstract

Risk Groups: Nursing Bottle Caries/Caries in the Elderly

Cited by 80 publications

References 36 publications

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence

A Predictive Model for Root Caries Incidence

Allergic Rhinitis, Feeding and Oral Habits, Toothbrushing and Socioeconomic Status

Interdisziplinäre Gesundheitsfrühförderung

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About