2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2017.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for zoonotic Salmonella transmission from pet reptiles: A survey on knowledge, attitudes and practices of reptile-owners related to reptile husbandry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall prevalence of Salmonella in captive Norwegian reptiles (43%, CI 33-53%) is consistent with the spectrum of prevalence's reported globally: Japan (74%) [6], Germany/Austria (54%) [3], Italy (51 and 57%) [4,22], Australia (47%) [10], Denmark (35%) [11], Taiwan (31%) [8], Trinidad (31%) [2], Republic of Korea (30%) [7], Croatia (13%) [37] and New Zealand (11%) [9]. The variation in reported Salmonella prevalence amongst different reptile populations may represent a true different in infection status, for instance Scheelings et al [10] found a higher prevalence of Salmonella in reptiles held in captivity (47%) compared to wild reptiles (14%), although this is yet to be confirmed by other studies.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Salmonella Spp In Captive Norwegian Reptiles supporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The overall prevalence of Salmonella in captive Norwegian reptiles (43%, CI 33-53%) is consistent with the spectrum of prevalence's reported globally: Japan (74%) [6], Germany/Austria (54%) [3], Italy (51 and 57%) [4,22], Australia (47%) [10], Denmark (35%) [11], Taiwan (31%) [8], Trinidad (31%) [2], Republic of Korea (30%) [7], Croatia (13%) [37] and New Zealand (11%) [9]. The variation in reported Salmonella prevalence amongst different reptile populations may represent a true different in infection status, for instance Scheelings et al [10] found a higher prevalence of Salmonella in reptiles held in captivity (47%) compared to wild reptiles (14%), although this is yet to be confirmed by other studies.…”
Section: Prevalence Of Salmonella Spp In Captive Norwegian Reptiles supporting
confidence: 85%
“…Additionally, the phenomenon of intermittent shedding probably accounts significantly for the variability in detection rates between authors [12]. In the studies from Croatia, New Zealand and Italy, sampling was performed by the animal's owner, which could have given some more unreliable results and thus lower prevalence [4,9,22,37].…”
Section: Prevalence Of Salmonella Spp In Captive Norwegian Reptiles mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In captive reptiles, the prevalence of Salmonella spp. is several times higher when drinking water is not replaced regularly [ 57 ]. Water recirculation and oxygenation are reduced in artificial ponds, and this may amplify different possible kinds of contamination [ 52 , 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Europe, direct or indirect contact with reptiles has been linked to Salmonella infection in humans, although the source of infection is unknown in many cases [48]. Since 2010, studies and reports have been conducted in various European countries related to the prevalence of Salmonella in turtles in UK [44], Italy [45], and Spain [8,46] (Table 3) as well as turtle-associated human salmonellosis in Spain [1,17], France [36,37], and Romania [38] (Table 2). In Spain in September 2010 and October 2011, S. enterica serovar Paratyphi B var Java and its possible monophasic variant 4,5,12:b:-dT+ were identified in eight and three human cases, respectively.…”
Section: Europementioning
confidence: 99%