2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for second primary non-breast cancer in pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer not treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy or endocrine therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association might be related to germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes, which increase the risk of both types of cancer [54], or to shared reproductive or environmental risk factors [55,56]. Moreover, it has been reported that an excess risk for second cancers remains in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer having not received any treatment [57]. By contrast, in postmenopausal women, the overall increased risk of second cancers with respect to the general population was lower when compared to premenopausal women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This association might be related to germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes, which increase the risk of both types of cancer [54], or to shared reproductive or environmental risk factors [55,56]. Moreover, it has been reported that an excess risk for second cancers remains in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer having not received any treatment [57]. By contrast, in postmenopausal women, the overall increased risk of second cancers with respect to the general population was lower when compared to premenopausal women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Only few of the studies evaluated the effect of treatment on the risk of second tumours [13,17,18,38,40], although the treatment modalities were not comparable among the studies. There are several studies exploring the effect of different breast cancer treatment strategies on second cancer risk [19,57], but it was not possible to combine them for the same reasons. Consequently, more studies investigating this issue are warranted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It has been proven that individuals who develop a malignancy might be at a greater risk of developing a second. On the one hand, the agents or factors that caused the first malignancy may still be at work, while on the other, chemotherapy and radiotherapy used in cancer treatment are known carcinogens 3, 4, 5, 6. The mechanisms require further exploration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in postmenopausal women the risk of cervical cancer was significantly reduced. The authors speculated that these observations resulted from intensified screening in comparison to the general population, and are related to different lifestyle factors and socioeconomic status [25]. In the studied group, 60.2% of women (213 of 354) were premenopausal at diagnosis of breast cancer, while 46.3% (164 of 354) were younger than 50 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published data indicate that age as well as menopausal status at diagnosis of breast cancer are important predictors of second primaries [16,[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]. Langballe et al, who investigated the risk of second malignancies in relation to menopausal status in women with breast cancer, noted that premenopausal women had an 18% increase in risk of appearance of second malignancy and this increased risk was confined to endometrial and ovarian cancers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%