2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02211.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for Permanent Pacemaker After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Literature

Abstract: Patients undergoing TAVI with implantation of CVP are at significantly higher risk for development of AV block and subsequent need for permanent PM, particularly if RBBB preexists. Since AV block occurs in >90% within the first week after the procedure, careful monitoring should be performed for at least 7 days after TAVI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
115
2
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
13
115
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical experience and the development of devices that can be more accurately deployed and potentially repositioned had clearly contributed to the decrease of the rate of permanent pacemaker implementation, far from the initial rate close to 40% [36,37].…”
Section: Procedural Features and In-hospital Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical experience and the development of devices that can be more accurately deployed and potentially repositioned had clearly contributed to the decrease of the rate of permanent pacemaker implementation, far from the initial rate close to 40% [36,37].…”
Section: Procedural Features and In-hospital Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of pacemaker intervention varies between about 5 to 30% in the literature depending on the TAVI device system and even when using the same device in different patients [24]. We have observed a very low (below 3%) frequency of arrhythmias requiring permanent pacemaker treatment after TAVI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Among the electrocardiographic (ECG) criteria, right bundle branch block is the strongest predictor for pacemaker requirement (24,25). To date, some investigations have reported descriptive changes in the surface ECG after TAVI (15,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). In the published trials, the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI with the CoreValve system has been reported to be 20% to 42.5%, and that of a new left bundle branch block has been reported to range between 50% and 70% (5,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31).…”
Section: Conduction Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, some investigations have reported descriptive changes in the surface ECG after TAVI (15,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). In the published trials, the incidence of permanent pacemaker implantation after TAVI with the CoreValve system has been reported to be 20% to 42.5%, and that of a new left bundle branch block has been reported to range between 50% and 70% (5,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). Nevertheless, with the balloon-expandable shorter Edwards SAPIEN prosthesis, which is placed in the aortic annulus without direct impact on the left ventricular outflow tract, the incidence of atrioventricular conduction block requiring pacemaker has been reported between 0% and 6% and the incidence of new-onset left bundle branch block has been reported to have a rate of 3.3% (32,33).…”
Section: Conduction Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%