2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1781(00)00185-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for obstetric complications and schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Preti and co-authors demonstrated that schizophrenic patients had significantly more frequently obstetrical complications than healthy subjects (Preti et al, 2000). Other authors indicated that prematurity was modestly associated with the risk to develop schizophrenia (Byrne et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, Preti and co-authors demonstrated that schizophrenic patients had significantly more frequently obstetrical complications than healthy subjects (Preti et al, 2000). Other authors indicated that prematurity was modestly associated with the risk to develop schizophrenia (Byrne et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Contributing to the modest number of events termed serious OCs is our strict definition (McNeil-Sjostrom Scale score of > 4); the use of the strict definition has two advantages: it defines a subset of individuals who have at minimum potentially greatly harmful obstetric complications and in our sample the OCs reported with severity X5 were nearly all associated with the potential to cause hypoxia in the fetus. However, other researchers have used a less stringent criterion for defining serious OCs (McNeil-Sjostrom Scale score of > 3; for example, Preti et al 5 ). We found that the frequency of OCs > 3 in probands was greater than reported by other studies (Preti et al 5 frequency of cases with OCs > 3 = 34%; present study: frequency of probands with OCs > 3 = 75%), which may reflect participation bias: mothers of probands who experienced OCs may have been more likely to respond to the birth questionnaire.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, other researchers have used a less stringent criterion for defining serious OCs (McNeil-Sjostrom Scale score of > 3; for example, Preti et al 5 ). We found that the frequency of OCs > 3 in probands was greater than reported by other studies (Preti et al 5 frequency of cases with OCs > 3 = 34%; present study: frequency of probands with OCs > 3 = 75%), which may reflect participation bias: mothers of probands who experienced OCs may have been more likely to respond to the birth questionnaire. Our use of the strict definition of serious OCs in interaction with hypoxia-regulated genes may suggest a threshold effect for severity of OCs; furthermore, reanalysis of the seven SNPs in Table 1 with the less strict definition of OCs > 3 leads to a larger number of probands classified as experiencing serious obstetric complications and thus increases statistical power but produced significant evidence for interaction with only two of the seven SNPs (AKT1 rs2494735 and rs1130233) (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations