2004
DOI: 10.7863/jum.2004.23.11.1455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk for Malignancy of Thyroid Nodules as Assessed by Sonographic Criteria

Abstract: This study indicates that the presence of intrinsic microcalcification is the only statistically reliable criterion on which to base increased suspicion for malignancy in thyroid nodules. Our results indicate the need for biopsy in determining further workup. All nodules that show the presence of intrinsic microcalcification should undergo biopsy, particularly if calcifications have a snowstorm appearance on sonography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
235
3
15

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 314 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
17
235
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Only a small percentage of thyroid nodules (5e6.5%) present features consistent with malignancy [9], but this possibility must always be considered, even when the nodule is small. In fact, malignancy shows no correlation with nodule size, and it is not uncommon to find lymph node metastases in patients with papillary carcinomas measuring no more than a few millimeters or even those that are occult [10].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Thyroidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only a small percentage of thyroid nodules (5e6.5%) present features consistent with malignancy [9], but this possibility must always be considered, even when the nodule is small. In fact, malignancy shows no correlation with nodule size, and it is not uncommon to find lymph node metastases in patients with papillary carcinomas measuring no more than a few millimeters or even those that are occult [10].…”
Section: Clinical Applications Thyroidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high-frequency ultrasound transducers currently being used display high sensitivity in detecting thyroid nodules, but they are less helpful in distinguishing malignant nodules from those that are benign [10]. Currently available techniques are thus highly accurate tools for discovering thyroid nodules, and ultrasonography can also be useful in the follow-up phase to detect changes in nodule size, but it does not make any significant contribution to the characterization of these nodules, which is based exclusively on ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (FNAB).…”
Section: Clinical Applications Thyroidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…US examination is the preferred first line modality of imaging in evaluating thyroid nodules, providing detection of signs associated with malignant nature, such as microcalcifications, hypoechogenicity, irregular margins or absent halo, intranodular vascularization greater than perinodular, and deeper than wide shape [2]. Even though sensitivity and specificity can be improved by combining these parameters, no single suspicious US feature is sufficiently sensitive or specific for diagnosing malignancy and the overall performance of US is not satisfactory [3][4][5][6]. Currently, fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the standard procedure to determine malignancy and is the method with the highest specificity (60-98 %), but with a varying sensitivity of 54-90 % [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include nodule hypoechogenicity, microcalcifications, irregular margins, an anteroposterior diameter that exceeds the longitudinal diameter, and chaotic intranodular vascularization. The strongest predictor of malignancydaside from hypoechogenicitydis the absence of the halo, according to some authors [13], or the presence of microcalcifications, according to others [14]. Our experience indicates that, despite its fundamental role in the study of thyroid nodules, sonography is not capable of clearly and definitively distinguishing between benign and malignant nodules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%