2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.03.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors to differentiate between benign proximal biliary strictures and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the absence of these factors may indicate the presence of a malignant lesion [15]. In cases of patients presenting with indeterminate biliary strictures and atypical biliary cytology ndings, advanced age (≥ 65 years), jaundice, and the identi cation of a mass lesion on imaging may serve as indicators of potential malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the absence of these factors may indicate the presence of a malignant lesion [15]. In cases of patients presenting with indeterminate biliary strictures and atypical biliary cytology ndings, advanced age (≥ 65 years), jaundice, and the identi cation of a mass lesion on imaging may serve as indicators of potential malignancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Irregular strictures, a concomitant pancreatic duct stricture ("double duct sign"), a mass lesion with delayed enhancement, secondary signs of malignancy (such as vascular infiltration and evidence of metastases) are signs of MBS. 16,45,46 The presence of a mass and delayed enhancement were reported to differentiate the MBS independently. 45,46 The sensitivity and specificity of cross-sectional radiological imaging for diagnosing MBS were reported to be 67-85% and 63-82%, respectively.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,45,46 The presence of a mass and delayed enhancement were reported to differentiate the MBS independently. 45,46 The sensitivity and specificity of cross-sectional radiological imaging for diagnosing MBS were reported to be 67-85% and 63-82%, respectively. 16,17 18F-FDG PET-CT, combining functional and anatomic imaging, plays an important role in malignancy diagnosis.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, patients at low risk of pCCA (abdominal pain, low CA19.9, and no mass on CT) will likely have benign disease. Therefore, that subgroup should undergo at least one repeat biopsy in addition to interval imaging and clinical follow-up [ 8 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%