2017
DOI: 10.1037/abn0000219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk factors that predict future onset of each DSM–5 eating disorder: Predictive specificity in high-risk adolescent females.

Abstract: Objective Because no single report has examined risk factors that predict future onset each type of eating disorder and core symptom dimensions that crosscut disorders, we addressed these aims to advance knowledge regarding risk factor specificity. Method Data from 3 prevention trials that targeted young women with body dissatisfaction (N=1272; M age 18.5, SD 4.2) and collected annual diagnostic interview data over 3-year follow-up were combined to identify predictors of subthreshold/threshold anorexia nervo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
343
1
14

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(404 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
29
343
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Exclusion criteria were a reported weight and height resulting in BMI <18 or >30 or a current diagnosis of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder. We allowed participants with a BMI of greater than 18 (which corresponds to the 10 th percentile) to enroll because data indicate that a low BMI increases risk for future onset of anorexia nervosa (16), making them ideal candidates for prevention programs designed to dually prevent obesity and eating disorders. Further, there is no evidence of iatrogenic effects of prevention programs dually targeting obesity and eating disorders for low-BMI individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exclusion criteria were a reported weight and height resulting in BMI <18 or >30 or a current diagnosis of DSM-IV anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, or binge eating disorder. We allowed participants with a BMI of greater than 18 (which corresponds to the 10 th percentile) to enroll because data indicate that a low BMI increases risk for future onset of anorexia nervosa (16), making them ideal candidates for prevention programs designed to dually prevent obesity and eating disorders. Further, there is no evidence of iatrogenic effects of prevention programs dually targeting obesity and eating disorders for low-BMI individuals.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have found that unhealthy weight control behaviors were endorsed by up to 76% of girls with obesity and 55% of boys with obesity and more extreme weight control behaviors were reported by 18% of girls with obesity and 6% of boys with obesity [20]. In comparison to their non-overweight peers, youth with overweight and obesity are more than twice as likely to endorse the use of unhealthy or extreme weight control behaviors [21], which merits clinical attention due to their association with a variety of adverse physical and psychosocial outcomes [22, 23], including future ED pathology [24]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the centrality of body image disturbances in models of risk and maintenance (e.g., Fairburn, Cooper, & Shafran, 2003; Stice, Gau, Rohde, & Shaw, 2017), and in diagnostic criteria for eating disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), this construct remains relatively loosely conceptualised, with terms often used interchangeably, or captured under umbrella concepts, such as ‘weight and shape concerns’ (e.g., La Mela et al, 2015; Murphy, Dooley, Menton, & Dolphin, 2016). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%