comparing 108 infertile patients with tubal obstruction to hysterosalpingography confirmed by methylene blue test (MBT-) in laparoscopy and 78 infertile patients with positive methylene blue test (MBT+) invalidating tubal obstruction in laparoscopy. Epi Info 7 software was used for statistical analysis. The p-value was considered significant for a p value < 5%. Results: Tubal obstruction was confirmed (MBT-) in 108 patients among the 186 selected for the study, i.e. 58.1%, and reversed (MBT+) in 78 patients, i.e. 41.9%. Tubal obstruction on laparoscopy was most observed in patients over 30 years old (84.3% vs 70.5%; OR=2.2 [1.1-4.6]; p<0.05), history of abortive endo-uterine maneuver (ORa=26 [17.9-38.9]; p<0.05), ectopic pregnancy (ORa=3.2 [1.4-52.1]; p<0.05), pelvic surgeries such as myomectomy (ORa=4.1 [1.2-18.4]; p<0.05), appendectomy ]; p<0.05) and salpingectomy (ORa=4.8 [2.3-12.5]; p<0.05) and suffering from chronic pelvic pain (ORa =4.1 [1.1-15.7]; p<0.03). The distal location of the tubal obstruction on HSG (ORa=2.8 [1.5-14.3]; p<0.05) and seropositivity for chlamydia trachomatis (ORa=41.2 [7.2 -234.8]; p<0.05) were most associated with negative MBT. Conclusion: The decision to perform a laparoscopy for tubal obstruction revealed by hysterosalpingography should take into account the determinants thus identified, especially when it comes to proximal tubal obstruction.