2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Risk Factors of Pre-Eclampsia/Eclampsia and Its Adverse Outcomes in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A WHO Secondary Analysis

Abstract: BackgroundPre-eclampsia has an immense adverse impact on maternal and perinatal health especially in low- and middle-income settings. We aimed to estimate the associations between pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and its risk factors, and adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes.MethodsWe performed a secondary analysis of the WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health. The survey was a multi-country, facility-based cross-sectional study. A global sample consisting of 24 countries from three regions and 373 healt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

37
256
10
21

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
37
256
10
21
Order By: Relevance
“…In Lecarpentier et al (2013) study also showed that chronic blood pressure in women before pregnancy increased the risk of preeclampsia which was consistent with the results of the present study [30]. The Results also showed that number of nulliparous individuals is higher in both groups than the others, and the prevalence of preeclampsia was higher in women without pregnancy, which is consistent with findings by Bilano [31]. Also, in Kashaniyan et al study, the occurrence of nulliparity was significantly higher among the women of the case group, so that nulliparity was considered as a risk factor for preeclampsia can be suggested the background of genetic or behavioral phenomenon in an individual [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In Lecarpentier et al (2013) study also showed that chronic blood pressure in women before pregnancy increased the risk of preeclampsia which was consistent with the results of the present study [30]. The Results also showed that number of nulliparous individuals is higher in both groups than the others, and the prevalence of preeclampsia was higher in women without pregnancy, which is consistent with findings by Bilano [31]. Also, in Kashaniyan et al study, the occurrence of nulliparity was significantly higher among the women of the case group, so that nulliparity was considered as a risk factor for preeclampsia can be suggested the background of genetic or behavioral phenomenon in an individual [32].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…It affects 5-10% of pregnancies worldwide and 4.6% of pregnancies in India. 1,2 It forms one member of the deadly triad, along with hemorrhage and infection that contribute greatly to maternal morbidity and mortality (14% worldwide, 29.54% in India). 3,4 Studies have shown that defective trophoblastic invasion of the placenta plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymptomatic bacteruria should be treated to prevent the occurrence of symptomatic bacteruria as cystitis and pyelonephritis and to prevent its hazards on pregnancy outcomes. At the same time it should be known that asymptomatic bacteruria carries a great risk for development of pre-eclampsia, chorio-amnionitis and preterm delivery [18] [19] [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%